Patterns of dissertation dissemination: publication-based outcomes of doctoral theses in the social sciences

Patterns of dissertation dissemination: publication-based outcomes of doctoral theses in the social sciences

Dissemination of knowledge through the publication of findings is a cornerstone of the academic research system. Doctoral dissertations document the findings made by early-stage researchers during their doctoral studies. However, prior research suggests that dissertations may not be effective in dis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientometrics Vol. 129; no. 4; pp. 2389 - 2405
Main Authors: Asanov, Anastasiya-Mariya, Asanov, Igor, Buenstorf, Guido, Kadriu, Valon, Schoch, Pia
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01-04-2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Citation analysis
Computer Science
Dissertations & theses
Documents
Empirical analysis
Information Storage and Retrieval
Library Science
Organizational aspects
Political science
Social sciences
Sociology
Ph.D. thesis
Doctoral students
Knowledge dissemination
Citation analysis
Research performance
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Dissemination of knowledge through the publication of findings is a cornerstone of the academic research system. Doctoral dissertations document the findings made by early-stage researchers during their doctoral studies. However, prior research suggests that dissertations may not be effective in disseminating these findings to the broader community of researchers. We study how knowledge documented in doctoral dissertations is disseminated. Specifically, we investigate which dissertation characteristics and institutional factors are related to the number of journal publications based on these dissertations and the number of citations that these publications receive. Our analysis uses a random sample of doctoral dissertations from German universities in economics, political science, and sociology. We find that “cumulative” dissertations—dissertations consisting of a number of separate articles—are turned into three times more publications which receive three times more citations than monographic dissertations. We also find explorative evidence that dissertations written in English and empirical dissertations have higher publication-based outcomes. We conclude that a policy allowing doctoral candidates to write their dissertations in a cumulative format provides them with an opportunity to share the results of their research through publications in peer-reviewed journals.
ISSN:0138-9130
1588-2861
DOI:10.1007/s11192-024-04952-1