Potential of DNA markers in detecting divergence and in analysing heterosis in Indian elite chickpea cultivars

Molecular markers such as RAPDs and microsatellites were used to study genetic diversity in 29 elite Indian chickpea genotypes. In general, micro-satellites were more efficient than the RAPD markers in detecting polymorphism in these genotypes. Among the various microsatellites, (AAC)5, (ACT)5, (AAG...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Theoretical and applied genetics Vol. 98; no. 8; pp. 1217 - 1225
Main Authors: Sant, V.J, Patankar, A.G, Sarode, N.D, Mhase, L.B, Sainani, M.N, Deshmukh, R.B, Ranjekar, P.K, Gupta, V.S
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Heidelberg Springer 01-06-1999
Berlin Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Molecular markers such as RAPDs and microsatellites were used to study genetic diversity in 29 elite Indian chickpea genotypes. In general, micro-satellites were more efficient than the RAPD markers in detecting polymorphism in these genotypes. Among the various microsatellites, (AAC)5, (ACT)5, (AAG)5 and (GATA)4 were able to differentiate all 29 chickpea cultivars. The mean value of probability of identical match by chance was 2.32 x 10(-25) using DraI-(ACT)5, TaqI-(AAC)5, TaqI-(AAG)5 and TaqI-(GATA)4 enzyme-probe combinations. The dendrogram, constructed on the basis of similarity index values, grouped the chickpea genotypes into five main clusters with 8 cultivars genetically distant and outgrouped from the main clusters. To investigate if DNA markers are useful in predicting F(1) performance and heterosis in chickpea, we crossed 8 genotypes having important agronomic characters in a diallel set. The F(1)s and their parents in the diallel set were analysed for agronomic traits for better parent and midparent heterosis. Heterosis was found to be much higher for yield than for yield components that fit a multiplicative model. The analysis of genetic divergence using D(2) statistics clustered the 8 cultivars into two groups. Although molecular marker-based genetic distance did not linearly correlate to heterosis, two heterotic groups could be identified on the basis of the general marker heterozygosity.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0040-5752
1432-2242
DOI:10.1007/s001220051187