Investigating Differences in Experts’ Chemistry Knowledge Structures and Comparing Them to Those of General Chemistry Students

Investigating Differences in Experts’ Chemistry Knowledge Structures and Comparing Them to Those of General Chemistry Students

This study aimed to examine the impact of years of experience and field of expertise on the development of chemistry knowledge structures from STEM experts comprising 103 professors, 10 postdocs, and 146 doctoral students. Of these participants, 127 were specialized in chemistry and the rest were fr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of chemical education Vol. 99; no. 8; pp. 2950 - 2963
Main Authors: Gulacar, Ozcan, Vernoy, Brandon, Tran, Emily, Wu, Arista, Huie, Emily Zhang, Santos, Efrain Vasquez, Wadhwa, Anish, Sathe, Risa, Milkey, Alexandra
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Easton American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc 09-08-2022
American Chemical Society
Subjects:
Association Measures
Chemistry
Cognitive Structures
College students
Colleges & universities
Educational Change
Educational materials
Educational Practices
Experts versus novices
Instructional Materials
Organic Chemistry
Reforming
Research facilities
Science Curriculum
Science education
STEM education
Students
Teaching methods
Word and letter association
Knowledge Structures
Concept Maps
Expert versus Novice
Constructivism
Chemistry Triplet
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study aimed to examine the impact of years of experience and field of expertise on the development of chemistry knowledge structures from STEM experts comprising 103 professors, 10 postdocs, and 146 doctoral students. Of these participants, 127 were specialized in chemistry and the rest were from various science and engineering disciplines. Although most participants were part of a research university located in Northern California, the pool included a small group of experts from different universities and countries. The main source of the data was a Word Association Test generated with 17 keywords that refer to major topics or concepts commonly introduced in the general chemistry curricula. The knowledge structures were examined to determine if the contents and the orientations of the clusters varied between the expert groups. In addition, their analysis was enriched with the consideration of chemistry triplet designations and central terms identified by eccentricity values on each structure. The overall expert knowledge structure generated in this study was also compared to undergraduate structures determined by using the same instrument and methodology. The investigation of the structures revealed several differences between expert groups and provided insight into the transformation of novices into experts. The paper also presents practical suggestions for educators on how to utilize structures while teaching, informing their instructional practices, and reforming teaching materials.
ISSN:0021-9584
1938-1328
DOI:10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00251