The control of Achillea millefolium in the Snowy Mountains of Australia

Summary The response of Achillea millefolium L. to herbicides was measured to determine the effectiveness of the current recommendations and to test alternative herbicides. Five plots at each of the three replicate sites were selected and randomly treated with one of the four herbicides: dicamba/2,4...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Weed research Vol. 43; no. 5; pp. 357 - 361
Main Authors: Sanecki, G M, Sanecki, K L, Wright, G T, Johnston, F M
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01-10-2003
Blackwell Science
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary The response of Achillea millefolium L. to herbicides was measured to determine the effectiveness of the current recommendations and to test alternative herbicides. Five plots at each of the three replicate sites were selected and randomly treated with one of the four herbicides: dicamba/2,4‐D, glyphosate, metsulfuron‐methyl and triclopyr/picloram. After 12 months, the recommended treatment, dicamba/2,4‐D, did not cause a significant reduction in aerial biomass compared with untreated controls and the number of flowering stems was significantly increased in treated plots. Metsulfuron‐methyl and triclopyr/picloram caused a significant reduction in A. millefolium aerial biomass but did not affect the number of flowering stems. Glyphosate produced a significant reduction in aerial biomass and was less effective. These results suggest that the current recommendation for A. millefolium might be improved. Site‐specific effects such as aspect may also influence the effectiveness of herbicides on this species.
Bibliography:ArticleID:WRE353
istex:B61398EE2177235F9BD56EE8FE989E9F3E7D654C
ark:/67375/WNG-Z9D6B560-P
ISSN:0043-1737
1365-3180
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-3180.2003.00353.x