Osmotic pressure of periimplant sulcular and gingival crevicular fluids: a split-mouth, randomized study of its measurement and clinical significance

Osmotic pressure of periimplant sulcular and gingival crevicular fluids: a split-mouth, randomized study of its measurement and clinical significance

Objectives: This study comparatively investigated periimplant sulcular fluid (PISF) and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) by means of the osmotic pressure (OP) levels of PISF (PISFOP) and GCF (GCFOP). It was a preliminary research that aimed to quantify PISFOP and GCFOP as well as to evaluate their cl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical oral implants research Vol. 22; no. 7; pp. 706 - 710
Main Authors: Sakallιoğlu, Umur, Lütfioğlu, Müge, Sakallιoğlu, Elif Eser, Sert, Sertaç, Ceylan, Gözlem
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-07-2011
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Bleeding
Clinical significance
Correlation
Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods
Dental Implants
Dentistry
Female
Gingiva
Gingival Crevicular Fluid
Gingival index
Gum disease
Humans
Jaw
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Mouth
Oral fluids
Osmosis
Osmotic Pressure
Parameters
Patients
periimplant disease
periimplant sulcular fluid
Periodontal Attachment Loss - pathology
periodontal disease
Periodontal Index
Periodontal Pocket - pathology
Periodontics
Plaque index
Randomization
Soft tissues
Statistics, Nonparametric
Teeth
Tissues
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives: This study comparatively investigated periimplant sulcular fluid (PISF) and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) by means of the osmotic pressure (OP) levels of PISF (PISFOP) and GCF (GCFOP). It was a preliminary research that aimed to quantify PISFOP and GCFOP as well as to evaluate their clinical significances around implants and teeth. Material and methods: Partially edentulous implant patients treated by the same clinicians and using the same implant system were randomized in a split‐mouth trial design. Fifty‐four implants and teeth from these patients were selected in the same mouth and jaw as matched pairs of samples, i.e. as symmetrical or corresponding implant and tooth. PISFOP/GCFOP measurement was performed by an osmometer following PISF/GCF sampling procedures. Clinical significance was evaluated by the correlations between PISFOP/GCFOP and some clinical examination parameters of periimplant/periodontal soft tissues. These parameters included Silness–Löe plaque index (PI), Löe–Silness gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD) and probing attachment level (PAL). Results: PISFOP was higher than GCFOP, and GI, BOP, PPD and PAL were higher in the implant group than in the tooth group (P<0.05). PISFOP positively correlated with the clinical parameters of implants (P<0.01 for PI, GI and BOP; P<0.05 for PPD and PAL), and GCFOP positively correlated with the clinical parameters of teeth (P<0.01 for PPD; P<0.05 for PI, GI, BOP and PAL). Conclusions: The results reveal that PISFOP and GCFOP may be measured by osmometer, and their levels may be related with the clinical conditions of periimplant/periodontal soft tissues. To cite this article: 
Sakallιoğlu U, Lütfioğlu M, Sakallιoğlu EE, Sert S, Ceylan G. Osmotic pressure of periimplant sulcular and gingival crevicular fluids: a split‐mouth, randomized study of its measurement and clinical significance.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 706–710
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02044.x
Bibliography:istex:F8616829BE6FC7DA3BF7BAD8CF154038FD95CBF4
ark:/67375/WNG-9SJLG9MD-G
ArticleID:CLR2044
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0905-7161
1600-0501
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02044.x