Double-masked randomized trial comparing alternate combinations of intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in abdominal aortic surgery

Improvement in patient outcome and reduced use of medical resources may result from using epidural anesthesia and analgesia as compared with general anesthesia and intravenous opioids, although the relative importance of intraoperative versus postoperative technique has not been studied. This prospe...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) Vol. 95; no. 5; pp. 1054 - 1067
Main Authors:	NORRIS, Edward J, BEATTIE, Charles, MARTIN, Barbara K, MINKEN, Stanley L, WILLIAMS, G. Melville, TRAYSTMAN, Richard J, PERLER, Bruce A, MARTINEZ, Elizabeth A, MEINERT, Curtis L, ANDERSON, Gerald F, GRASS, Jeffrey A, SAKIMA, Neil T, GORMAN, Randolph, ACHUFF, Stephen C
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Hagerstown, MD Lippincott 01-11-2001
Subjects:	Aged Analgesia, Patient-Controlled Anesthesia Anesthesia depending on type of surgery Anesthesia, Epidural Anesthesia, General Anesthesia, Intravenous Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Aorta, Abdominal - surgery Biological and medical sciences Blood Pressure - drug effects Double-Blind Method Enflurane Female Fentanyl Hospital Mortality Hospitalization - economics Humans Intraoperative Period Length of Stay Male Medical sciences Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control Postoperative Period Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass Abdominal aorta Human Postoperative Analgesia Regional anesthesia Intravenous administration Surgery Extradural administration General anesthesia Self administration Technique Comparative study
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Improvement in patient outcome and reduced use of medical resources may result from using epidural anesthesia and analgesia as compared with general anesthesia and intravenous opioids, although the relative importance of intraoperative versus postoperative technique has not been studied. This prospective, double-masked, randomized clinical trial was designed to compare alternate combinations of intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with respect to postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery of the abdominal aorta. One hundred sixty-eight patients undergoing surgery of the abdominal aorta were randomly assigned to receive either thoracic epidural anesthesia combined with a light general anesthesia or general anesthesia alone intraoperatively and either intravenous or epidural patient-controlled analgesia postoperatively (four treatment groups). Patient-controlled analgesia was continued for at least 72 h. Protocols were used to standardize perioperative medical management and to preserve masking intraoperatively and postoperatively. A uniform surveillance strategy was used for the identification of prospectively defined postoperative complications. Outcome evaluation included postoperative hospital length of stay, direct medical costs, selected postoperative morbidities, and postoperative recovery milestones. Length of stay and direct medical costs for patients surviving to discharge were similar among the four treatment groups. Postoperative outcomes were similar among the four treatment groups with respect to death, myocardial infarction, myocardial ischemia, reoperation, pneumonia, and renal failure. Epidural patient-controlled analgesia was associated with a significantly shorter time to extubation (P = 0.002). Times to intensive care unit discharge, ward admission, first bowel sounds, first flatus, tolerating clear liquids, tolerating regular diet, and independent ambulation were similar among the four treatment groups. Postoperative pain scores were also similar among the four treatment groups. In patients undergoing surgery of the abdominal aorta, thoracic epidural anesthesia combined with a light general anesthesia and followed by either intravenous or epidural patient-controlled analgesia, offers no major advantage or disadvantage when compared with general anesthesia alone followed by either intravenous or epidural patient-controlled analgesia.
Bibliography:	ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-News-3 content type line 23
ISSN:	0003-3022 1528-1175
DOI:	10.1097/00000542-200111000-00006