Search Results - "Rudas, Margarete"

  • Showing 1 - 7 results of 7
Refine Results
  1. 1

    Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: influence of number of specimens on diagnostic accuracy by Lomoschitz, Friedrich M, Helbich, Thomas H, Rudas, Margarete, Pfarl, Georg, Linnau, Ken F, Stadler, Alfred, Jackman, Roger J

    Published in Radiology (01-09-2004)
    “…To determine whether number of specimens obtained at stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy with the patient prone influences diagnostic accuracy…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  2. 2

    Lesion miss rates and false-negative rates for 1115 consecutive cases of stereotactically guided needle-localized open breast biopsy with long-term follow-up by Riedl, Christopher C, Pfarl, Georg, Memarsadeghi, Mazda, Wagner, Teresa, Fitzal, Florian, Rudas, Margarete, Helbich, Thomas H

    Published in Radiology (01-12-2005)
    “…To retrospectively determine the lesion miss rate and false-negative rate of needle-localized open breast biopsy (NLOBB) with stereotactic guidance in a large…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  3. 3

    Fas ligand is expressed in normal breast epithelial cells and is frequently up-regulated in breast cancer by Müllauer, Leonhard, Mosberger, Isabella, Grusch, Michael, Rudas, Margarete, Chott, Andreas

    Published in The Journal of pathology (01-01-2000)
    “…Fas (CD95/Apo‐1) is a cell membrane receptor that upon binding by its ligand (FasL), triggers a signal resulting in apoptotic cell death. Fas is produced by…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  4. 4

    The Negative Predictive Value of Electrical Impedance Scanning in BI-RADS Category IV Breast Lesions by Fuchsjaeger, Michael H, Flöry, Daniel, Reiner, Cäcilia S, Rudas, Margarete, Riedl, Christopher C, Helbich, Thomas H

    Published in Investigative radiology (01-07-2005)
    “…OBJECTIVES:We sought to prospectively assess the value of electrical impedance scanning (EIS) in discriminating benign from malignant lesions classified as…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  5. 5

    Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: MR imaging versus Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography by Helbich, T H, Becherer, A, Trattnig, S, Leitha, T, Kelkar, P, Seifert, M, Gnant, M, Staudenherz, A, Rudas, M, Wolf, G, Mostbeck, G H

    Published in Radiology (01-02-1997)
    “…To compare the accuracies of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and scintimammography in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions. MR imaging was…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  6. 6

    Coaxial technique: approach to breast core biopsies by Helbich, T H, Mayr, W, Schick, S, Youssefzadeh, S, Rudas, M, Taucher, S, Wagner, T, Kelkar, P, Wolf, G, Thurnher, M, Mostbeck, G H

    Published in Radiology (01-06-1997)
    “…To assess the feasibility of the coaxial core breast biopsy technique performed under stereotactic and ultrasound (US) guidance in vitro and in vivo. Biopsies…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  7. 7