Low‐cost tools for large‐scale seed scarification: efficiency in two species from South American arid lands

Low‐cost tools for large‐scale seed scarification: efficiency in two species from South American arid lands

The use of native plants for arid land restoration requires the application of pre‐germination treatments to alleviate seed dormancy mechanisms. As it is known, scarification allows several valuable species to overcome the primary forms of dormancy. However, supplying large quantities of scarified s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Restoration ecology Vol. 32; no. 6
Main Authors: Pérez, Daniel R., Basaez, Pablo E., Rodríguez Araujo, Maria E., Lagos, Leonilda J., Campos, Damián F.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Malden, USA Wiley Periodicals, Inc 01-08-2024
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Arid lands
Arid zones
desertification
Dormancy
Effectiveness
Environmental restoration
Germination
Indigenous plants
Indigenous species
Land degradation
Larrea genus
Poverty
pre‐germination treatments
Restoration
scaling‐up
Seeds
seed‐based restoration
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The use of native plants for arid land restoration requires the application of pre‐germination treatments to alleviate seed dormancy mechanisms. As it is known, scarification allows several valuable species to overcome the primary forms of dormancy. However, supplying large quantities of scarified seeds at a low cost represents a significant challenge. In this context, our objective was to evaluate locally constructed machines accessible to people of degraded lands in a state of poverty. The effectiveness was evaluated by comparing two native shrubs from South American arid lands, Larrea divaricata and L. cuneifolia. Four treatments were applied: control (T0), mechanical scarification with a hand drill equipped with sandpaper on its head (T1), and mechanical scarification for 15 seconds (T2) and 30 seconds (T3) with a self‐constructed machine, capable of regulating pressure and speed. For both species, the germination probability was higher with T2 (0.82 ± 0.02) compared to T0 (0.28 ± 0.03) and T1 (0.65 ± 0.03). T3 presented intermediate values (0.75 ± 0.03) but did not differ significantly from T1 and T2. Our results show the effectiveness of a locally constructed seed scarification tool to upscale seed‐based restoration in arid lands.
Bibliography:Author contributions: DRP conceived and designed the research and wrote the document; PEB, DFC performed the machine design and construction; DRP, MERA analyzed the data and edited the manuscript; LJL performed the lab experiment.
ISSN:1061-2971
1526-100X
DOI:10.1111/rec.14114