Impact of presentation timing in metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer: Characterization of patients and identification of prognostic factors
Background The treatment and surveillance of metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has evolved since the introduction of several treatment intensification options associated with hormonal blockade and classifications based on the timing of metastatic disease presentation and disease v...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Prostate Vol. 84; no. 6; pp. 560 - 569 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01-05-2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
The treatment and surveillance of metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has evolved since the introduction of several treatment intensification options associated with hormonal blockade and classifications based on the timing of metastatic disease presentation and disease volume. Using a hospital‐based registry, we aimed to assess whether these new classifications are applicable to our population, as few studies have demonstrated their prognostic value for overall survival (OS) and time to development of castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and to establish prognostic factors in our population.
Methods
A retrospective cohort of mHSPC patients who were attended at an oncology referral hospital in Bogota between 2017 and 2021 were included in this study. The primary and secondary endpoints were OS and time to CRPC. The distribution of outcome measures was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Proportional hazard models were constructed using the Cox regression approach and stratified according to risk factors.
Results
The study cohort included 373 patients. The median castration resistance‐free survival was 48 months (CI: 32–73 months), and OS was 43 months (CI: 37–48 months). In multivariate analysis, nodal staging, ECOG status, and surgical castration were independent prognostic factors.
Conclusion
In our hospital‐based registry, the independent impact of the time of presentation on castration‐resistant‐free survival or OS could not be demonstrated, nor could the grouping of prognostic categories based on metastatic presentation temporality and volume. Other independent prognostic factors have been proposed. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0270-4137 1097-0045 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pros.24672 |