Factors predictive of macrosomia in pregnancies with a positive oral glucose challenge test: Importance of fasting plasma glucose
Abstract Aim The study aimed to determine the factors associated with fetal macrosomia following a positive oral glucose challenge test (OGCT). Methods In this retrospective single-centre study of 1268 pregnancies with positive 50-g OGCTs (plasma glucose ≥ 130 mg/dL, or 7.2 mmol/L), gestational diab...
Saved in:
Published in: | Diabetes & metabolism Vol. 40; no. 1; pp. 43 - 48 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Paris
Elsevier Masson SAS
01-02-2014
Masson Elsevier Masson |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Aim The study aimed to determine the factors associated with fetal macrosomia following a positive oral glucose challenge test (OGCT). Methods In this retrospective single-centre study of 1268 pregnancies with positive 50-g OGCTs (plasma glucose ≥ 130 mg/dL, or 7.2 mmol/L), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) was defined as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 95 mg/dL (5.3 mmol/L) and/or postprandial glucose (PPG) ≥ 120 mg/dL (6.7 mmol/L). Results In GDM pregnancies, the odds ratios adjusted for confounders (age, BMI, ethnicity, parity and weight gain) were 2.02 for macrosomia (Z score ≥ 1.28) and 2.62 for severe macrosomia (Z score ≥ 1.88). For each 10-mg/dL increase in FPG, the mean birth–weight increase was 60 g. Macrosomia risk did not differ between GDM patients with normal FPG (< 95 mg/dL, or 5.3 mmol/L) and non-diabetics, but increased significantly in cases of FPG ≥ 95 mg/dL and regardless of the level of PPG. Conclusion In our study population, birth–weight and macrosomia risk were strongly correlated with FPG, suggesting that it is a simple and efficient marker for the risk of macrosomia. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1262-3636 1878-1780 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.diabet.2013.01.008 |