Phase II trial of vinorelbine and estramustine in the treatment of metastatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy using estramustine and vinorelbine in chemotherapy-naı̈ve patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC). The patients ( n = 54) received oral estramustine 840 mg/day on Days 1 to 14 a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Urologic oncology Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 32 - 35
Main Authors: Borrega, Pablo, Velasco, Amalia, Bolaños, Matilde, del Mar Páerez, Maráia, Mel, Josáe Ramáon, Reina, Juan Josáe, Rodráiguez-Jaraiz, Maráia Angeles, Chaves, Manuel, Gonzáalez-Baráon, Manuel
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 2004
Elsevier Science
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy using estramustine and vinorelbine in chemotherapy-naı̈ve patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC). The patients ( n = 54) received oral estramustine 840 mg/day on Days 1 to 14 and IV vinorelbine 25 mg/m 2 on Days 1 and 8 of every 3 wk cycle. The median number of cycles per patient was 9 (range, 1 to 27). Fifty-three patients were evaluable for toxicity and survival and 52 for prostate specific antigen (PSA) response. Median age was 68 (range, 46–80). PSA sustained decrease >50% was seen in 52% of patients (95% CI: 38–66%). A complete response was seen in 3 and a partial response in 12 of 25 patients with measurable disease, for an overall objective response of 60% (95% CI: 41–79%). Improvement in performance status was observed in 30 out of 43 evaluable for clinical benefit response. The median duration of response was 7 mo and median time to progression was 6 mo. The median survival time was 15 mo. The most common adverse event was mild gastrointestinal toxicity. In general, toxicity G3–4 was low: granulocytopenia Grade 3–4 (8%), thrombocytopenia Grade 3 (6%), and anemia Grade 3 (13%). Other Grade 3 toxicities included deep vein thrombosis (4%), hepatic (2%), cardiac ischemia (2%), fatigue (6%), and sensory neuropathy (2%). There were 2 treatment-related deaths (4%). We conclude that vinorelbine and estramustine as used in this trial is an efficacious and well-tolerated therapeutic regimen in the management of HRPC.
ISSN:1078-1439
1873-2496
DOI:10.1016/S1078-1439(03)00102-9