Diagnostic Modalities in Primary Immunodeficiency

As the field of inborn errors of immunity expands, providers continually update and fine-tune their diagnostic approach and selection of testing modalities to increase diagnostic accuracy. Here, we first describe a mechanistic consideration of laboratory testing, highlighting both benefits and drawb...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology Vol. 63; no. 1; pp. 90 - 98
Main Authors: Raymond, Loveita S., Leiding, Jennifer, Forbes-Satter, Lisa R.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Springer US 01-08-2022
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:As the field of inborn errors of immunity expands, providers continually update and fine-tune their diagnostic approach and selection of testing modalities to increase diagnostic accuracy. Here, we first describe a mechanistic consideration of laboratory testing, highlighting both benefits and drawbacks of currently clinically available testing modalities. Next, we provide methods in evaluation of patients presenting with concern for inborn errors of immunity as defined by the International Union of Immunological Societies 2019 phenotypic categories: primary antibody deficiencies, cellular and humoral immune deficiency, disorders of the innate immune system, and syndrome-associated and primary immune regulation disorders (PIRDs). Using the suggested approach in this paper as a roadmap highlights the importance of thorough history taking and physical examination as the foundation to guide further diagnostic tests. This is followed by enumeration and functional testing. Finally, to determine the underlying molecular etiology-specific genetic panels, chromosomal microarrays, and broad genetic testing (whole exome sequencing or whole genome sequencing) are available.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1559-0267
1080-0549
1559-0267
DOI:10.1007/s12016-022-08933-1