PCSK9 inhibitors associated hyperglycemic disorders: a real world, pharmacovigilance study

Abstract Background Initial genetic and biological studies indicated an association between proprotein-convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) and hyperglycemic disorders. However, subsequent clinical trials yielded inconsistent results, and real-world data are scant. Purpose We sough...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European heart journal Vol. 42; no. Supplement_1
Main Authors: Goldman, A G, Raschi, E R, Cukierman-Yaffe, T Y, Dankner, R D, Shouval, R S, Shechter, M D, Ben-Zvi, I B Z, Maor, E M
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 12-10-2021
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Initial genetic and biological studies indicated an association between proprotein-convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) and hyperglycemic disorders. However, subsequent clinical trials yielded inconsistent results, and real-world data are scant. Purpose We sought to assess the association of PCSK9i and hyperglycemic events in a real-world setting, using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS). Methods The FAERS database (2015–2020) was retrospectively queried to assess reporting of PCSK9i-associated hyperglycemic events. Disproportionality analyses were performed using an adjusted odds ratio (adj.ROR), and the lower bound of the information component (IC) 95% credibility interval (IC025>0 is deemed significant). Results The full database included 7,295,624 eligible patients, among them 71,748 reports of evolocumab and 15,976 of alirocumab. Compared to the full database, treatment with evolocumab, but not alirocumab, was associated with increased reporting of hyperglycemic events (n=1,587 [2.21%], adj.ROR = 1.24 [1.15–1.32], IC025 = 0.20; n=254 [1.59%], adj.ROR = 0.73 [0.60–0.88], IC025 = −0.38, respectively). Hyperglycemic events were primarily mild hyperglycemic disorders (n=1,262 [1.76%], adj.ROR = 1.56 [1.42–1.71], IC025 = 0.58), whereas diabetes was not over-reported (n=325 [0.45%], adj.ROR = 0.73 [0.63–0.86], IC025 = −0.82). Hyperglycemic events were over-reported with evolocumab versus ezetimibe (adj.ROR = 1.81 [1.06–3.07]), albeit were less frequently reported versus statins (adj.ROR = 0.44 [0.40–0.49]). Most of the hyperglycemic events occurred during the first six months of treatment and were reversible. Conclusion In a real-world setting, evolocumab (but not alirocumab) was consistently associated with mild hyperglycemic disorders, but not diabetes. Although initial monitoring is warranted, the favorable glycemic safety profile compared to statins supports their essential role in the management of lipid disorders. Potential different effects of evolocumab and alirocumab on glucose metabolism should be further evaluated prospectively. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2934