Stochastic preemptive goal programming of Air Force weapon systems mix

We demonstrate a new approach to conducting a military force structure study under uncertainty. We apply the stochastic preemptive goal program approach, described by Ledwith et al., to balance probabilistic goals for military force effectiveness and the force’s cost. We use the Bayesian Enterprise...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Journal of defense modeling and simulation Vol. 20; no. 2; pp. 147 - 158
Main Authors:	Anderson, Justin L, Astudillo, Jessica M, Butcher, Zachary E, Cornman, Matthew D, Correale, Anthony J, Crumpacker, James B, Dennie, Nathaniel C, Gaines, Alex R, Gallagher, Mark A, Goodwill, John C, Graves, Emily S, Hale, Donald B, Holland, Kimberly G, Huffman, Benjamin D, McGee, Michelle, Pollack, Nicholas A, Ramirez, Rachel C, Song, Camero, Swize, Emmie K, Tello, Erick A, Wales, Jesse G, Walker, Julius C, Wilson, Andrew B, Wilson, William F, Wooten, Kylie E, Zawadzki, Marcelo
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	London, England SAGE Publications 01-04-2023
Subjects:	military forces risk goal programming Stochastic uncertainty weapon systems
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	We demonstrate a new approach to conducting a military force structure study under uncertainty. We apply the stochastic preemptive goal program approach, described by Ledwith et al., to balance probabilistic goals for military force effectiveness and the force’s cost. We use the Bayesian Enterprise Analytic Model (BEAM), as described in “Probabilistic Analysis of Complex Combat Scenarios,” to evaluate effectiveness, expressed in terms of the probability of achieving campaign objectives, in three hypothetical scenarios. We develop cost estimates along with their uncertainty to evaluate the force’s research and development, production, and annual operating and support costs. Our summary depicts how the trade-off between various prioritized goals influences the recommended robust force. Our approach enables defense leaders to balance risk in both force effectiveness in various scenarios along with risk in different types of cost categories.
ISSN:	1548-5129 1557-380X
DOI:	10.1177/15485129211051751