Patient deprivation and perceived scan burden negatively impact the quality of whole-body MRI

To evaluate the association between the image quality of cancer staging whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) and patient demographics, distress, and perceived scan burden. A sample of patients recruited prospectively to multicentre trials comparing WB-MRI with standard scans for staging lu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical radiology Vol. 75; no. 4; pp. 308 - 315
Main Authors: Taylor, S.A., Kalasthry, J., Sakai, N.S., Miles, A., Aboagye, A., Atkin, G., Ball, S., Beable, R., Beare, S., Beeston, T., Bharwani, N., Bhowmik, A., Blakeway, L., Bridgewater, J., Butawan, R., Campbell, Y., Chang, E., Chao, D., Chukundah, S., Conteh, V., Crosbie, J., Desai, K., Duggan, M., Engledow, A., Everitt, C., Ferdous, S., Frow, A., Furneaux, M., Gibbons, N., Goh, V., Gourtsoyianni, S., Green, A., Green, Liz, Groves, A., Guthrie, A., Hadley, E., Hameeduddin, A., Hanid, G., Hans, S., Hans, B., Honeyfield, L., Hughes, H., Hughes, J., Isaac, E., Jackson, M., Janes, S., Jannapureddy, R., Jayme, A., Johnson, A., Johnson, E., Julka, P., Kellaway, J., Khan, S., Light, T., Limbu, P., Locke, I., Lucas, N., Marwood, E., McGowan, J., Mills-Baldock, T., Morris, S., Morton, A., Nasseri, S., Norman, C., Nunes, A., Obichere, A., O'Donohue, J., Oliver, A., Patel, U., Perry, K., Piga, W., Prior, K., Punwani, S., Rafiee, H., Rahman, F., Ramesh, S., Reczko, K., Robinson, D., Rockall, A., Russell, P., Sargus, K., Scurr, E., Shahabuddin, K., Sharp, A., Shepherd, B., Simeon, C., Snell, D., Spence, J., Stachini, V., Stirling, J., Strickland, N., Tarver, K., Thaha, M., Tunariu, N., Wanstall, C., Wilson, J., Win, T., Woodrow, L., Yu, D.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01-04-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To evaluate the association between the image quality of cancer staging whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) and patient demographics, distress, and perceived scan burden. A sample of patients recruited prospectively to multicentre trials comparing WB-MRI with standard scans for staging lung and colorectal cancer were invited to complete two questionnaires. The baseline questionnaire, administered at recruitment, collated data on demographics, distress and co-morbidity. The follow-up questionnaire, completed after staging investigations, measured perceived WB-MRI scan burden (scored 1 low to 7 high). WB-MRI anatomical coverage, and technical quality was graded by a radiographic technician and grading combined to categorise the scan as “optimal”, “sub-optimal” or “degraded”. A radiologist categorised 30 scans to test interobserver agreement. Data were analysed using the chi-square, Fisher's exact, t-tests, and multinomial regression. One hundred and fourteen patients were included in the study (53 lung, 61 colorectal; average age 65.3 years, SD=11.8; 66 men [57.9%]). Overall, 45.6% (n=52), scans were classified as “optimal” quality, 39.5% (n=45) “sub-optimal”, and 14.9% (n=17) as “degraded”. In adjusted analyses, greater deprivation level and higher patient-reported scan burden were both associated with a higher likelihood of having a sub-optimal versus an optimal scan (odds ratio [OR]: 4.465, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.454 to 13.709, p=0.009; OR: 1.987, CI: 1.153 to 3.425, p=0.013, respectively). None of the variables predicted the likelihood of having a degraded scan. Deprivation and patients' perceived experience of the WB-MRI are related to image quality. Tailored protocols and individualised patient management before and during WB-MRI may improve image quality. •Higher patient social deprivation is associated with poorer WB-MRI scan quality.•Higher patient-reported WB-MRI scan burden is associated with poorer scan quality.•Tailored protocols and individualised patient management before and during WB-MRI may improve image quality.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0009-9260
1365-229X
DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2019.10.019