Setting priorities for protected area planning in a conflict zone – Afghanistan’s National Protected Area System Plan
► We developed methods to evaluate areas for protection in Afghanistan. ► We use Priority Zones to identify areas that may retain significant biodiversity. ► Priority Zones have the greatest potential to become future protected areas. ► Afghanistan has set quantitative protected area goals despite o...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Biological conservation Vol. 148; no. 1; pp. 146 - 155 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier Ltd
01-04-2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | ► We developed methods to evaluate areas for protection in Afghanistan. ► We use Priority Zones to identify areas that may retain significant biodiversity. ► Priority Zones have the greatest potential to become future protected areas. ► Afghanistan has set quantitative protected area goals despite ongoing conflict. ► Our methods may be useful in other data-poor or conflict countries.
Planning for protected area networks is often done on an ad hoc basis, especially in data-poor countries. Afghanistan, a country mired in conflict for the past 30years, has little of the relevant data to plan a protected area network, and security concerns hinder collection of new data. However, conservation of Afghanistan’s natural resources will be critical to recovery efforts. To assist Afghanistan in planning for its protected area network, we conducted an analysis to identify ecologically important areas for conservation. We overlaid data from ecoregion, floral, and faunal analyses on a grid map of Afghanistan (313 cells each 2500km2), and used a ranking system to determine those cells containing diverse and/or threatened ecosystems. A color gradation was applied to each cell (white – least diverse to black – most diverse) to produce a map visually depicting ecological diversity across Afghanistan. Those cells with the highest scores were labeled as Priority Zones – defined as areas in which Afghanistan should prioritize conservation activities for protected area designation. Our results formed the basis of the National Protected Area System Plan of Afghanistan, a document setting quantitative protected area targets and outlining a concrete plan of action for the designation of a protected area network. We found the Priority Zone model to be useful in helping Government partners locate areas potentially important for conservation and prioritize activities for protected area designation. This process may be useful for other conflict or post-conflict countries working to establish protected area networks in a data deficient environment. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.021 |
| ISSN: | 0006-3207 1873-2917 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.021 |