Crop type mapping using LiDAR, Sentinel-2 and aerial imagery with machine learning algorithms

LiDAR data are becoming increasingly available, which has opened up many new applications. One such application is crop type mapping. Accurate crop type maps are critical for monitoring water use, estimating harvests and in precision agriculture. The traditional approach to obtaining maps of cultiva...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Geo-spatial information science Vol. 24; no. 2; pp. 215 - 227
Main Authors:	Prins, Adriaan Jacobus, Van Niekerk, Adriaan
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Wuhan Taylor & Francis 03-04-2021 Taylor & Francis Ltd Taylor & Francis Group
Subjects:	Accuracy Aerial photography Aerial surveys Algorithms Classification crop type classification Crops Datasets Digitization Digitizing Evaluation Human error Labels LiDAR Machine learning Mapping multispectral imagery per-pixel classification Precision farming Remote sensing Satellite imagery sentinel-2 Water monitoring Water use
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	LiDAR data are becoming increasingly available, which has opened up many new applications. One such application is crop type mapping. Accurate crop type maps are critical for monitoring water use, estimating harvests and in precision agriculture. The traditional approach to obtaining maps of cultivated fields is by manually digitizing the fields from satellite or aerial imagery and then assigning crop type labels to each field - often informed by data collected during ground and aerial surveys. However, manual digitizing and labeling is time-consuming, expensive and subject to human error. Automated remote sensing methods is a cost-effective alternative, with machine learning gaining popularity for classifying crop types. This study evaluated the use of LiDAR data, Sentinel-2 imagery, aerial imagery and machine learning for differentiating five crop types in an intensively cultivated area. Different combinations of the three datasets were evaluated along with ten machine learning. The classification results were interpreted by comparing overall accuracies, kappa, standard deviation and f-score. It was found that LiDAR data successfully differentiated between different crop types, with XGBoost providing the highest overall accuracy of 87.8%. Furthermore, the crop type maps produced using the LiDAR data were in general agreement with those obtained by using Sentinel-2 data, with LiDAR obtaining a mean overall accuracy of 84.3% and Sentinel-2 a mean overall accuracy of 83.6%. However, the combination of all three datasets proved to be the most effective at differentiating between the crop types, with RF providing the highest overall accuracy of 94.4%. These findings provide a foundation for selecting the appropriate combination of remotely sensed data sources and machine learning algorithms for operational crop type mapping.
ISSN:	1009-5020 1993-5153
DOI:	10.1080/10095020.2020.1782776