Habitat complexity versus habitat heterogeneity: Invertebrates prefer macrophyte stands with intermediate biomass and high functional diversity
Aquatic macrophytes serve as shelter and a direct source of food for invertebrates, in addition to indirectly providing items such as algae, detritus, and microorganisms. Thus, aquatic macrophytes act as habitat structuring elements, requiring a distinction between habitat complexity (physical forma...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Freshwater biology Vol. 69; no. 9; pp. 1278 - 1291 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Oxford
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01-09-2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Aquatic macrophytes serve as shelter and a direct source of food for invertebrates, in addition to indirectly providing items such as algae, detritus, and microorganisms. Thus, aquatic macrophytes act as habitat structuring elements, requiring a distinction between habitat complexity (physical formations such as fractal dimensions, density and biomass) and habitat heterogeneity (diversity of these structures). Here we explore the effects of habitat complexity and habitat heterogeneity on the invertebrate community.
We collected macrophytes and invertebrates from 28 sampling sites along a 13.7‐km stretch of the Baía River in Brazil, and examined specific groups (insects, microcrustaceans, and other invertebrates). Environmental variables in the sites were also measured. We aimed to explore the effects of habitat complexity (measured by macrophyte biomass) and habitat heterogeneity (evaluated through macrophyte functional diversity) on the richness and abundance of invertebrates.
We found that overall invertebrate richness was positively influenced solely by habitat heterogeneity. For invertebrate abundance, intermediate habitat complexity had more invertebrates, while habitat heterogeneity had a positive impact. Environmental variables influenced only the abundance. For specific groups, insect richness was positively influenced by habitat heterogeneity, while insect abundance decreased with high complexity and increased with high heterogeneity. Microcrustacean abundance was positively influenced by habitat complexity. Richness and abundance of other invertebrates was positively influenced by habitat heterogeneity.
Invertebrates prefer macrophyte stands with intermediate complexity and high heterogeneity. Abundance is linked to structural complexity and heterogeneity, while species richness is more strongly associated with heterogeneity. Furthermore, the impact of these factors varies among invertebrate groups.
These findings emphasise the importance of integrating a broad range of metrics, such as macrophyte biomass and functional diversity, to gain a thorough understanding of invertebrate community dynamics in future studies. Additionally, our study demonstrates that preserving macrophyte stands with high heterogeneity significantly enhances the diversity of associated invertebrate species. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0046-5070 1365-2427 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/fwb.14305 |