Small-bodied males invest in larger testes when highly ornamented

Sperm competition and male mating rate are two non-mutually exclusive key evolutionary pressures selecting for larger testes within and across animal taxa. A few studies have tried to test the role of mating rate in the absence of sperm competition. Under the mating rate hypothesis, particular pheno...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of evolutionary biology Vol. 37; no. 5; pp. 548 - 554
Main Authors: de Souza, André Rodrigues, Polo, João Lucas Lapria, Santos, Eduardo Fernando, do Nascimento, Fábio Santos, Rantala, Markus J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England 06-05-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Sperm competition and male mating rate are two non-mutually exclusive key evolutionary pressures selecting for larger testes within and across animal taxa. A few studies have tried to test the role of mating rate in the absence of sperm competition. Under the mating rate hypothesis, particular phenotypes of a given population which are expected to gain more mates (e.g. more ornamented males) are expected to make higher investment in testes size (a proxy for sperm production). We test this prediction in Polistes simillimus, a neotropical paper wasp in which females are single-mated (no sperm competition) and males can mate with multiple partners. Testes size was predicted by body size (positive association), sexual ornamentation (negative association), and their interaction (among small males, testes size was positively related to ornamentation but the opposite pattern was observed among large males). We propose that small-bodied well-ornamented males may face the highest risk of sperm depletion. Small-bodied males make relatively higher investment in testes size when highly ornamented. This strategy might be less profitable to large males, as they have overall larger testes. Our results provide strong evidence for the mating rate hypothesis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1420-9101
1420-9101
DOI:10.1093/jeb/voae044