A program to respond to otitis media in remote Australian Aboriginal communities: a qualitative investigation of parent perspectives

A program to respond to otitis media in remote Australian Aboriginal communities: a qualitative investigation of parent perspectives

Indigenous infants and children in Australia, especially in remote communities, experience early and chronic otitis media (OM) which is difficult to treat and has lifelong impacts in health and education. The LiTTLe Program (Learning to Talk, Talking to Learn) aimed to increase infants' access...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC pediatrics Vol. 18; no. 1; p. 99
Main Authors: Jones, Caroline, Sharma, Mridula, Harkus, Samantha, McMahon, Catherine, Taumoepeau, Mele, Demuth, Katherine, Mattock, Karen, Rosas, Lee, Wing, Raelene, Pawar, Sulabha, Hampshire, Anne
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 06-03-2018
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects:
Caregivers
Children
Health aspects
Hearing loss
Indigenous
Interventions
Otitis media
Patient outcomes
Practice
Qualitative
Risk factors
Australia
Otitis media
Interventions
Qualitative
Indigenous
Hearing loss
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Indigenous infants and children in Australia, especially in remote communities, experience early and chronic otitis media (OM) which is difficult to treat and has lifelong impacts in health and education. The LiTTLe Program (Learning to Talk, Talking to Learn) aimed to increase infants' access to spoken language input, teach parents to manage health and hearing problems, and support children's school readiness. This paper aimed to explore caregivers' views about this inclusive, parent-implemented early childhood program for 0-3 years in an Aboriginal community health context. Data from in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 9 caregivers of 12 children who had participated in the program from one remote Aboriginal community in the Northern Territory are presented. Data were analysed thematically. Caregivers provided overall views on the program. In addition, three key areas of focus in the program are also presented here: speech and language, hearing health, and school readiness. Caregivers were positive about the interactive speech and language strategies in the program, except for some strategies which some parents found alien or difficult: such as talking slowly, following along with the child's topic, using parallel talk, or baby talk. Children's hearing was considered by caregivers to be important for understanding people, enjoying music, and detecting environmental sounds including signs of danger. Caregivers provided perspectives on the utility of sign language and its benefits for communicating with infants and young children with hearing loss, and the difficulty of getting young community children to wear a conventional hearing aid. Caregivers were strongly of the opinion that the program had helped prepare children for school through familiarising their child with early literacy activities and resources, as well as school routines. But caregivers differed as to whether they thought the program should have been located at the school itself. The caregivers generally reported positive views about the LiTTLe Program, and also drew attention to areas for improvement. The perspectives gathered may serve to guide other cross-sector collaborations across health and education to respond to OM among children at risk for OM-related disability in speech and language development.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1471-2431
1471-2431
DOI:10.1186/s12887-018-1081-3