Economic analysis of Eucalyptus biomass cultivation for energy in Argentina

•Viability of energy biomass production in Argentina is modelled for the last 12 years.•Viability depends on macroeconomic factors rather than primary productivity.•Subsidies are necessary for projects to become economically viable.•The break-even price of biomass depends on the exchange rate and do...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy Vol. 8; p. 100085
Main Authors: Olemberg, Demián, Lupi, Ana María
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 01-08-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Viability of energy biomass production in Argentina is modelled for the last 12 years.•Viability depends on macroeconomic factors rather than primary productivity.•Subsidies are necessary for projects to become economically viable.•The break-even price of biomass depends on the exchange rate and domestic costs. The objective of this study was to conduct an ex-ante evaluation of the viability of Eucalyptus grandis biomass plantations in northeastern Argentina, modeling the effects of changes in the economic context (relative prices) for the years 2010–2022. The developed model enables the estimation of the minimum viable price for forest biomass production and includes a sensitivity analysis. Moreover, it contributes to understanding the evolution of economic viability conditions, enabling anticipation of future scenarios. The results indicate that, for most of the time series analyzed and under average conditions for different scenarios, the model is not viable. This is because the minimum price set by biomass production and supply conditions exceeds the maximum price that the energy transformation stage can pay without incurring losses. Our methodology could assist in modelling future economic investment projects, and facilitate the incorporation of technical, economic and policy variants. The results establish a baseline on which future project evaluations could more explicitly incorporate environmental aspects and other externalities in decision-making from a societal standpoint.
ISSN:2772-8013
2772-8013
DOI:10.1016/j.clcb.2024.100085