Diagnosing scaphoid fractures: radiographs cannot be used as a gold standard

Diagnosing scaphoid fractures: radiographs cannot be used as a gold standard

To evaluate the reproducibility of the interpretation of radiographs for the diagnosis of scaphoid fractures, 134 radiographs (60 consecutive patients) were blindly observed by a resident radiologist, consultant radiologist, resident trauma surgeon and consultant trauma surgeon. The results of radio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Injury Vol. 23; no. 2; p. 77
Main Authors: Tiel-van Buul, M M, van Beek, E J, Broekhuizen, A H, Nooitgedacht, E A, Davids, P H, Bakker, A J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Netherlands 1992
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Carpal Bones - injuries
Clinical Competence
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Female
Fractures, Bone - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Radiography
Radionuclide Imaging
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To evaluate the reproducibility of the interpretation of radiographs for the diagnosis of scaphoid fractures, 134 radiographs (60 consecutive patients) were blindly observed by a resident radiologist, consultant radiologist, resident trauma surgeon and consultant trauma surgeon. The results of radiographs were analysed using kappa (kappa) statistics and stratified according to the results of the corresponding bone scan. In 23 patients the bone scan was positive for fracture of the scaphoid. Irrespective of training and experience, the kappa of the comparison of the scores of the radiographs between any two observers did not exceed 40 per cent. After stratification of the outcome of the bone scan, the kappa did not increase significantly. A panel of three experienced observers gave their opinion of all radiographs. The results were compared with the bone scan results. We conclude that radiographs in suspected scaphoid fracture cannot be used as a reliable diagnostic approach because of the low inter-observer agreement in the interpretation, irrespective of the experience and training of the observer.
ISSN:0020-1383
DOI:10.1016/0020-1383(92)90035-Q