Identification and assessment of Electronic Aids for Daily Living considered essential by persons with high level tetraplegia: a case series

Identification and assessment of Electronic Aids for Daily Living considered essential by persons with high level tetraplegia: a case series

Although assistive technology (AT) is recognized as a basic human right, access to AT, and particularly electronic aids to daily living (EADL), is limited. We aimed to understand how persons with high level spinal cord injury (SCI) prioritize EADL needs and assess satisfaction and efficacy of self-i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Disability and rehabilitation: Assistive technology Vol. 19; no. 8; pp. 1 - 3171
Main Authors: Ripat, Jacquie, Nixdorf, Cherry, Cowley, Kristine C
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Taylor & Francis Ltd 01-11-2024
Subjects:
Access
Adaptive technology
Community living
Efficacy
Employment
Home environment
Inpatient care
Occupational therapy
Rehabilitation
Spinal cord
Spinal cord injuries
Tetraplegics
physical independence
community living
Spinal cord injury
quality of life
community participation
physical disability
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Although assistive technology (AT) is recognized as a basic human right, access to AT, and particularly electronic aids to daily living (EADL), is limited. We aimed to understand how persons with high level spinal cord injury (SCI) prioritize EADL needs and assess satisfaction and efficacy of self-identified EADL. Thus, in this case series, we recruited three participants with C4, C5 or C6 SCI receiving in-patient SCI rehabilitation. Each received dedicated occupational therapy-based assistance in identifying EADL items within an unrestricted envelope of support ($5000 CDN) for use in maximizing physical independence and supporting their return to community-based living. Items identified were categorized by need (emergency/security; home environment control; or virtual access to the outside world). Each participant selected distinct EADL. Evaluation of selected EADL items indicated very high satisfaction. The selected EADL contributed to participants' returns to employment, community life, or reduced requirements for attendant services. These findings suggest that identification of essential technology should reflect the unique needs of each person and the context in which it will be used. These findings also support use of mainstream technology to meet EADL needs of individuals with limited physical abilities.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-3
ObjectType-Case Study-4
ISSN:1748-3107
1748-3115
1748-3115
DOI:10.1080/17483107.2024.2323145