Foraging and mating behaviors of Hypsignathus monstrosus at the bat‐human interface in a central African rainforest
Studying wildlife space use in human‐modified environments contributes to characterize wildlife‐human interactions to assess potential risks of zoonotic‐pathogens transmission, and to pinpoint conservation issues. In central African rainforests with human dwelling and activities, we conducted a tele...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecology and evolution Vol. 13; no. 7; pp. e10240 - n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01-07-2023
Wiley Open Access John Wiley and Sons Inc Wiley |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Studying wildlife space use in human‐modified environments contributes to characterize wildlife‐human interactions to assess potential risks of zoonotic‐pathogens transmission, and to pinpoint conservation issues. In central African rainforests with human dwelling and activities, we conducted a telemetry study on a group of males of Hypsignathus monstrosus, a lek‐mating fruit bat identified as a potential maintenance host for Ebola virus. During a lekking season in 2020, we investigated the foraging‐habitat selection and the individual nighttime space use during both mating and foraging activities close to villages and their surrounding agricultural landscape. At night, marked individuals strongly selected agricultural lands and more generally areas near watercourses to forage, where they spent more time compared to forest ones. Furthermore, the probability and duration of the presence of bats in the lek during nighttime decreased with the distance to their roost site but remained relatively high within a 10 km radius. Individuals adjusted foraging behaviors according to mating activity by reducing both the overall time spent in foraging areas and the number of forest areas used to forage when they spent more time in the lek. Finally, the probability of a bat revisiting a foraging area in the following 48 hours increased with the previous time spent in that foraging area. These behaviors occurring close to or in human‐modified habitats can trigger direct and indirect bat‐human contacts, which could thus facilitate pathogen transmission such as Ebola virus.
Wild animals may adapt or not to human‐altered landscapes and interact with humans. In this field study, we highlighted that an African fruit bat species primarily forages in agricultural lands and watercourses that surround small forestry villages. We also provide insights about space use dynamic of individuals during their nocturnal foraging and breeding activities. These data improve basic knowledge about the interface between fruit bats and human rural communities and highlight potential mechanisms for pathogen transmission. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Correction added on 13 July 2023, after first online publication: “N’Kaya Tobi” was inadvertently omitted and has been added as one of the authors in this version. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2045-7758 2045-7758 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ece3.10240 |