As(III)‐to‐As(V) Oxidation in Copper Smelter Wastewater by In Situ‐Generated Ozone
As(III) is the most common arsenic species in copper smelter wastewater but is difficult to remove, and an oxidation to As(V) is desirable. The oxidation of As(III) to As(V) in copper smelter wastewater was studied using in situ‐generated ozone, which has a high oxidation capacity and does not creat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Chemical engineering & technology Vol. 45; no. 6; pp. 1201 - 1206 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frankfurt
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01-06-2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | As(III) is the most common arsenic species in copper smelter wastewater but is difficult to remove, and an oxidation to As(V) is desirable. The oxidation of As(III) to As(V) in copper smelter wastewater was studied using in situ‐generated ozone, which has a high oxidation capacity and does not create secondary contaminants. With the aim to determine adequate conditions for As(III) oxidation, experiments considering pH, ozonation time, and oxygen flow rate as variables were done. Experimental tests showed that the best pH was at 2 and with a moderate oxygen flow rate. The complete oxidation of As(III) in both synthetic wastewater and real wastewater was achieved nearly after the same time of ozonation. Pseudo‐first‐order kinetics could model the As(III)‐to‐As(V) oxidation by ozone.
Oxidation of As(III) to As(V) in copper smelter wastewater was studied using in situ‐generated ozone, which has a high oxidation capacity and does not create secondary contaminants. Best results were obtained at pH 2 and with a moderate oxygen flow rate for the ozonation. The complete oxidation of As(III) in both synthetic and real wastewater was achieved nearly after the same ozonation time. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Data available on request from the authors |
ISSN: | 0930-7516 1521-4125 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ceat.202100584 |