Low-Dose Lisinopril in Normotensive Men With Idiopathic Oligospermia and Infertility: A 5-Year Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Pilot Study

The outcomes of drug treatment for male infertility remain conjectural, with controversial study results. Our pilot study employed a randomized, placebo‐controlled, crossover methodology with intention‐to‐treat analysis. Thirty‐three men with idiopathic oligospermia were randomized to start either d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics Vol. 91; no. 4; pp. 582 - 589
Main Authors: Mbah, A U, Ndukwu, G O, Ghasi, S I, Shu, E N, Ozoemena, F N, Mbah, J O, Onodugo, O D, Ejim, E C, Eze, M I, Nkwo, P O, Okonkwo, P O
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Basingstoke Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-04-2012
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The outcomes of drug treatment for male infertility remain conjectural, with controversial study results. Our pilot study employed a randomized, placebo‐controlled, crossover methodology with intention‐to‐treat analysis. Thirty‐three men with idiopathic oligospermia were randomized to start either daily oral lisinopril 2.5 mg (n = 17) or daily oral placebo (n = 16). Lisinopril was found to cause a normalization of seminal parameters in 53.6% of the participants. Although the mean ejaculate volume was unchanged (P ≥ 0.093), the total sperm cell count and the percentage of motile sperm cells increased (P ≤ 0.03 and P < 0.001, respectively), whereas the percentage of sperm cells with abnormal morphology decreased (P ≤ 0.04). The pregnancy rate was 48.5%, and there was no serious adverse drug event. It is concluded, albeit cautiously, that prolonged treatment with 2.5 mg/day of oral lisinopril may be well tolerated in normotensive men with idiopathic oligospermia, may improve sperm quantity and quality, and may enhance fertility in approximately half of those treated. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2012); 91 4, 582–589. doi:10.1038/clpt.2011.265
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-ZCJWBR50-4
istex:79A24224019405EF5EF58781536827C7DA465506
ArticleID:CPTCLPT2011265
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0009-9236
1532-6535
DOI:10.1038/clpt.2011.265