Short- versus standard-course antibiotic therapy for urinary tract infection in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Urinary tract infections are prevalent among children and are responsible for a significant healthcare burden. Antibiotic therapy is the cornerstone of treatment, but the optimal treatment duration remains elusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the optimal duration of ant...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West) |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Germany
01-10-2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Urinary tract infections are prevalent among children and are responsible for a significant healthcare burden. Antibiotic therapy is the cornerstone of treatment, but the optimal treatment duration remains elusive.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for urinary tract infection (UTI) in pediatric patients.
A comprehensive search was performed, including MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases.
We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing short-course (2 to 5 days) and standard-course (≥ 7 days) antibiotic treatment in patients < 18 years of age.
We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis following Cochrane Collaboration recommendations using a random-effects model. Effect estimate was calculated using the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for dichotomous and mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for continuous endpoints. Significance was regarded at p-value < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.1.
Data from 12 RCTs, encompassing 1442 children, were included. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 12 months. The mean age was 5.9 years, with approximately 87% female patients. E. coli was the most common pathogen isolated from urine cultures. There was a significant difference in cure rates (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.95-0.99; p = 0.01) between the groups when only studies that included febrile UTI were analyzed together, favoring 7 days or more of treatment, but with high heterogeneity. Otherwise, there was no significant difference in cure rates (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.91-1.08; p = 0.80) in children with afebrile UTI or recurrence of UTI at any time in children with afebrile (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.84-1.15; p = 0.80) or febrile UTI (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.10-2.83; p = 0.45). Also, there was no significant difference in failure rates in children with urinary tract abnormalities and afebrile UTI (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.47-1.32; p = 0.36), between the short- and the standard-course treatment groups.
This analysis was limited by the moderate heterogeneity and the small subgroup of children with urinary tract abnormalities, which could have underpowered our results.
The primary outcome of this analysis suggests that a short course of antibiotic therapy is feasible in children with afebrile UTI, but more studies are warranted to safely establish an optimal treatment duration for children with febrile UTI.
The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO platform under the number CRD42023489094. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 0931-041X 1432-198X 1432-198X |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00467-024-06509-z |