RETAIL REDLINING: ARE GASOLINE PRICES HIGHER IN POOR AND MINORITY NEIGHBORHOODS?
This study uses new data on retail gasoline prices in three cities to provide evidence on the relationship between neighborhood characteristics and consumer prices. We find that prices do not vary greatly with neighborhood racial composition, but that prices are higher in poor neighborhoods. For a 1...
Saved in:
Published in: | Economic inquiry Vol. 49; no. 3; pp. 795 - 809 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-07-2011
Western Economic Association International Blackwell Publishers Ltd Western Economic Association |
Series: | Economic Inquiry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This study uses new data on retail gasoline prices in three cities to provide evidence on the relationship between neighborhood characteristics and consumer prices. We find that prices do not vary greatly with neighborhood racial composition, but that prices are higher in poor neighborhoods. For a 10% point increase in poor families relative to middle‐upper income families, retail gasoline prices increase by an average of 0.70%. Two‐thirds of this differential is explained by cost, competition, and demand characteristics of poor neighborhoods. The remaining differential likely reflects price discrimination in response to lower competition and/or more inelastic demand in poor neighborhoods. (JEL D43, J15, L71) |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:4D96D25957955F8376C216581EA5E0F78CDA5CAB ArticleID:ECIN317 ark:/67375/WNG-ZFF9W6Q4-K We wish to thank Peter Matthews for helpful feedback, Jack Cuneo for his assistance in using ArcGIS to geocode gas stations and provide several geographic variables, and Carrie MacFarlane and Brenda Ellis for their assistance with ArcGIS and Geolytics software. We also wish to thank the remaining students from an undergraduate seminar who assisted with the station surveys: Harrison Brown, Michael Campbell, Matthew Engel, Ryan Fink, Annabelle Fowler, Daniel Haluska, Christopher Hench, Winslow Hicks, Blake Johnson, JiaHao Li, Quincy Liao, Shenique Moxey, Cameron Poole, Mona Quarless, Leah Shackleton, and Mary Walsh. ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0095-2583 1465-7295 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00317.x |