Central and effector memory T cells in peripheral blood of patients with interstitial pneumonia: preliminary clues from a COVID-19 study
Background SARS-CoV-2 pre-existing T-cell immune reactivity can be present in some people. A general perturbation of the main peripheral lymphocyte subsets has been described in severe COVID-19 patients, but very few studies assessed the general memory T-cell homeostasis in the acute phase of COVID-...
Saved in:
Published in: | Respiratory research Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 1 - 278 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
London
BioMed Central Ltd
10-10-2022
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background SARS-CoV-2 pre-existing T-cell immune reactivity can be present in some people. A general perturbation of the main peripheral lymphocyte subsets has been described in severe COVID-19 patients, but very few studies assessed the general memory T-cell homeostasis in the acute phase of COVID-19. Here, we performed a general analysis of the main memory T cell populations in the peripheral blood of patients admitted to the hospital for a confirmed or probable COVID-19 diagnosis. Methods In this cross-sectional study, adult patients (aged [greater than or equal to] 18 years) needing hospital admission for respiratory disease due to confirmed or probable COVID-19, were recruited before starting the therapeutic protocol for this disease. In addition to the assessment of the general lymphocyte subpopulations in the early phase of COVID-19, central memory T cells (Tm.sub.centr cells: CD45RO+CCR7+) and effector memory T cells (Tm.sub.eff cells: CD45RO+CCR7-) were assessed by multi-color flow cytometry, in comparison to a control group. Results During the study period, 148 study participants were recruited. Among them, 58 patients turned out positive for SARS-CoV-2 PCR (including both patients with interstitial pneumonia [PCR+Pn+] and without this complication [PCR+Pn-]), whereas the remaining 90 patients resulted to be SARS-CoV-2 PCR negative, even though all were affected with interstitial pneumonia [PCR-Pn+]. Additionally, 28 control patients without any ongoing respiratory disease were recruited. A clear unbalance in the T memory compartment emerged from this analysis on the whole pool of T cells (CD3+ cells), showing a significant increase in Tm.sub.centr cells and, conversely, a significant decrease in Tm.sub.eff cells in both pneumonia groups (PCR+Pn+ and PCR-Pn+) compared to the controls; PCR+Pn- group showed trends comprised between patients with pneumonia (from one side) and the control group (from the other side). This perturbation inside the memory T cell compartment was also observed in the individual analysis of the four main T cell subpopulations, based upon the differential expression of CD4 and/or CD8 markers. Conclusion Overall, we observed both absolute and relative increases of Tm.sub.centr cells and decrease of Tm.sub.eff cells in patients affected with interstitial pneumonia (regardless of the positive or negative results of SARS-CoV-2 PCR), compared to controls. These results need confirmation from additional research, in order to consider this finding as a potential biological marker of interstitial lung involvement in patients affected with viral respiratory infections. Keywords: Memory T cells, Interstitial pneumonia, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Central memory T cells, Effector memory T cells, Lymphocyte subpopulations |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Other Sources-1 content type line 63 ObjectType-Correspondence-1 |
ISSN: | 1465-993X 1465-9921 1465-993X 1465-9921 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12931-022-02190-8 |