Vocal Load of University Professors: Preliminary Results

Purpose. To describe the acoustic characteristics of a classroom, voice quality, fatigue, and vocal load of university professors. Methods. Exploratory, observational, longitudinal, and descriptive study with a single group of participants, including vocal monitoring data over two weeks. Acoustic ch...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista de investigación e innovación en ciencias de la salud Vol. 6; no. 1; pp. 73 - 97
Main Authors: Oliveira, Cristiane Lemos Carvalho de, Viola, Denise Nunes, Miranda, Tarciane Machado, Souza, Marcelo Santos de, Masson, Maria Lúcia Vaz
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Fundación Universitaria María Cano 01-01-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose. To describe the acoustic characteristics of a classroom, voice quality, fatigue, and vocal load of university professors. Methods. Exploratory, observational, longitudinal, and descriptive study with a single group of participants, including vocal monitoring data over two weeks. Acoustic characterization of the classroom, perceptual-auditory evaluation, and acoustic analysis of voice samples were conducted before and after classes. Vocal dosimetry was performed during classes, and the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) was assessed at the beginning of each week. Descriptive analysis of the findings was conducted, and randomization test was performed to verify the internal reliability of the judge. Results. All participants reported speaking loudly in the classroom, with the majority reporting vocal changes in the past six months, and only one participant reported a current vocal change. The classroom had acoustical measures and estimations that deviated from established standards. The professors used high vocal intensities during classes. After the classes, an increase in the absolute values of the aggregated data for CAPE-V, jitter, and fundamental frequency was found, varying within the range of normality. Furthermore, there was an observed increase in both post-lesson intensity and VFI when comparing the two-week period. Conclusions. Vocal intensities and VFI were possibly impacted by the acoustics of the classroom. The increase in average VFI between the weeks may be attributed to a cumulative fatigue sensation. Further research with a larger number of participants and in acoustically conditioned classrooms is suggested in order to evaluate collective intervention proposals aimed at reducing the vocal load on teachers.
ISSN:2665-2056
2665-2056
DOI:10.46634/riics.241