Age differences in the behavioural economics of cannabis use: Do adolescents and adults differ on demand for cannabis and discounting of future reward?

Age differences in the behavioural economics of cannabis use: Do adolescents and adults differ on demand for cannabis and discounting of future reward?

Adolescence is a period of psychological and neural development in which harms associated with cannabis use may be heightened. We hypothesised that adolescent who use cannabis (adolescentsWUC) would have steeper delay discounting (preference for immediate over future rewards) and greater demand (rel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Drug and alcohol dependence Vol. 238; p. 109531
Main Authors: Borissova, A., Soni, S., Aston, E.R., Lees, R., Petrilli, K., Wall, M.B., Bloomfield, M.A.P., Mertzani, E., Paksina, A., Freeman, T.P., Mokrysz, C., Lawn, W., Curran, H.V.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Ireland Elsevier B.V 01-09-2022
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects:
Adolescent
Adolescents
Adult
Adults
Age
Age differences
Analgesics
Behavioral economics
Cannabis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Delay
Delay Discounting
Discounting
Drug abuse
Economics, Behavioral
Elasticity
Expenditures
Gender
High risk
Humans
Marijuana
Marijuana purchase task
Marijuana Smoking - psychology
Psychological development
Reinforcement
Reward
Rewards
Socioeconomic status
Socioeconomics
Valuation
Cannabis
Delay discounting
Marijuana purchase task
Adolescent
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Adolescence is a period of psychological and neural development in which harms associated with cannabis use may be heightened. We hypothesised that adolescent who use cannabis (adolescentsWUC) would have steeper delay discounting (preference for immediate over future rewards) and greater demand (relative valuation) for cannabis than adults who use cannabis (adultsWUC). This cross-sectional study, part of the ‘CannTeen’ project, compared adultsWUC (n = 71, 26–29 years old) and adolescentsWUC (n = 76, 16–17 years old), and gender- and age-matched adolescent (n = 63) and adult (n = 64) controls. AdolescentsWUC and adultsWUC used cannabis 1–7 days/week and were matched on cannabis use frequency (4 days/week). The Monetary Choice Questionnaire assessed delay discounting. A modified Marijuana Purchase Task (MPT) assessed cannabis demand in adolescentsWUC and adultsWUC. The MPT yielded five indices: intensity (amount of cannabis used at zero cost), Omax (total peak expenditure), Pmax (price at peak expenditure), breakpoint (cost at which cannabis demand is suppressed to zero) and elasticity (degree to which cannabis use decreases with increasing price). Analyses were adjusted for covariates of gender, socioeconomic status, other illicit drug use. Both adolescentsWUC and adultsWUC had steeper delay discounting than controls (F, (1,254)= 9.13, p = 0.003, ηp2= 0.04), with no significant age effect or interaction. AdolescentsWUC showed higher intensity (F, (1,138)= 9.76, p = 0.002, ηp2= 0.07) and lower elasticity (F, (1,138)= 15.25, p < 0.001, ηp2= 0.10) than adultsWUC. There were no significant differences in Pmax, Omax or breakpoint. Individuals who use cannabis prefer immediate rewards more than controls. AdolescentsWUC, compared to adultsWUC, may be in a high-risk category with diminished sensitivity to cannabis price increases and a greater consumption of cannabis when it is free. •Cannabis users (CU) showed steeper delay discounting than age-matched controls.•Adolescent CU have higher intensity of cannabis demand than adults.•Adolescent CU have lower elasticity of cannabis demand than adults.•Both user groups show a behavioural economic profile that may underlie CUD.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
these authors contributed equally to the work, for joint first authorship
ISSN:0376-8716
1879-0046
DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109531