Exercise combined with Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for chronic pain: One‐year follow‐up from a randomized controlled trial

Background Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a type of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, which has demonstrated positive outcomes in individuals with chronic pain. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of an 8‐week programme combining Exercise with Acceptance and Commitment Thera...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of pain Vol. 28; no. 6; pp. 913 - 928
Main Authors: Casey, M. B., Takemasa, S., O'Reilly, T., Leamy, M., Mc Kearney, E., Buckley, M., Smart, K. M., Segurado, R., Lowry, D., Flanagan, D., Gopal, H., Hearty, C., Doody, C.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England 01-07-2024
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a type of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, which has demonstrated positive outcomes in individuals with chronic pain. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of an 8‐week programme combining Exercise with Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ExACT) with a standalone supervised exercise programme at 1‐year follow‐up. Methods One hundred and seventy‐five people with chronic pain were randomly assigned to ExACT or supervised exercise only. The primary outcome was pain interference measured with the Brief Pain Inventory‐Interference Scale. Secondary and treatment process outcomes included pain severity, depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, pain self‐efficacy, fear avoidance, pain acceptance, committed action, healthcare utilization, patient satisfaction, and global impression of change. Estimates of treatment effects at 1‐year follow‐up were based on intention‐to‐treat analyses, implemented using a linear mixed‐effects model. Results Eighty‐three participants (47.4%) returned the outcome measures at 1‐year follow‐up. No significant difference was observed between the groups for the primary outcome, pain interference. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups, in favour of ExACT for pain catastrophizing. Within group improvements that were observed within both groups at earlier timepoints were maintained at 1‐year follow‐up for many of the secondary and treatment process outcomes. ExACT group participants reported higher levels of satisfaction with treatment and global perceived change. Conclusions The study results showed no significant difference between the two groups for the primary outcome pain interference at 1‐year follow‐up. Future research could investigate factors that may predict and optimize outcomes from these types of intervention for people living with chronic pain. Significance Few previous randomized controlled trials investigating ACT for chronic pain have included long‐term follow‐up. This study found that Exercise combined with ACT was not superior to supervised exercise alone for reducing pain interference at 1‐year follow‐up. Further research is necessary to identify key processes of therapeutic change and to explore how interventions may be modified to enhance clinical outcomes for people with chronic pain.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1090-3801
1532-2149
1532-2149
DOI:10.1002/ejp.2229