Computerized medical records in monitoring hypertension. Longitudinal and horizontal evaluation of 25 general practitioners in a primary care setting of Modena, Italy

This study aims at evaluating the effectiveness of a computerized-based Clinical Record in monitoring hypertension in a Primary Care Setting. Blood pressure (BP) recording increased by 62% to 70% in the years 2004 to 2006. No improvement, however, was noticeable in the achievement of gold-standard t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Recenti progressi in medicina Vol. 100; no. 1; p. 4
Main Authors: Perrone, Enrica, Padula, Maria Stella, Scarpa, Marina, Acerbi, Maria Angela, Andreoli, Claudio, Baldoni, Patrizia, Bannò, Gabriella, Bregoli, Renato, Campolieti, Manfredo, Cataldo, Nicola, Daya, Ghassan, D'Urso, Anna Rita, Feltri, Gaetano, Gualandrini, Alessandra, Lambertini, Giorgio, Mazzi, Wainer, Modafferi, Gino Paolo, Mussati, Pierpaolo, Onesti, Luca, Piancone, Cataldo, Pieralisi, Fernando, Poppi, Maria Cristina, Scaglioni, Alberto, Tsoutsis, Nycolaos, Turrini, Stefano, Viola, Elisabetta, Capelli, Oreste
Format: Journal Article
Language:Italian
Published: Italy 01-01-2009
Subjects:
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study aims at evaluating the effectiveness of a computerized-based Clinical Record in monitoring hypertension in a Primary Care Setting. Blood pressure (BP) recording increased by 62% to 70% in the years 2004 to 2006. No improvement, however, was noticeable in the achievement of gold-standard targets in BP control (62% in all period). At the end of 2006 BP was recorded in 65% of patients. Among them, 2/3 of the non diabetics reached < 140/90 mmHg standard, while only 23% of diabetics reached < 130/80 mmHg standard. In conclusion, using a computerized clinical record appears not to be sufficient to obtain good clinical performances, yet it is a necessary first step to clinical audit.
ISSN:0034-1193