Application of fMRI and Simultaneous fMRI-EEG Neurofeedback in Post-Stroke Motor Rehabilitation

This article discusses the contribution of fMRI- and fMRI-EEG-neurofeedback into recovery of motor function in two subacute stroke patients during the early post-stroke period. Premotor and supplementary motor zones of the cortex were chosen as the targets of voluntary control. Patient 1 received 6...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine Vol. 171; no. 3; pp. 379 - 383
Main Authors: Bezmaternykh, D. D., Kalgin, K. V., Maximova, P. E., Mel’nikov, M. Ye, Petrovskii, E. D., Predtechenskaya, E. V., Savelov, A. A., Semenikhina, A. A., Tsaplina, T. N., Shtark, M. B., Shurunova, A. V.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Springer US 01-07-2021
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article discusses the contribution of fMRI- and fMRI-EEG-neurofeedback into recovery of motor function in two subacute stroke patients during the early post-stroke period. Premotor and supplementary motor zones of the cortex were chosen as the targets of voluntary control. Patient 1 received 6 sessions of motor imagery-based fMRI neurofeedback of secondary motor areas activity and Patient 2 received a similar course with the addition of μ- and β-EEG activity suppression. Both reduced the motor deficit severity, improved on the quality of life, and increased the C3/C4 coherence to other central leads within EEG μ-band. Patient 1 reliably increased the fMRI signal in target areas and improved on the strength and speed of hand movements. Patient 2 (fMRI-EEG) mastered the EEG activity regulation to a greater degree. The authors conclude that pure fMRI neurofeedback and bi-modal fMRI-EEG neurofeedback produce different clinical effects in motor rehabilitation, which confirms the prospect of the closed-loop stroke treatment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:0007-4888
1573-8221
DOI:10.1007/s10517-021-05232-1