Integration between a demo size post-combustion CO2 capture and full size power plant. An integral approach on energy penalty for different process options

► Evaluation of capture options should be done integrated with the power plant. ► Integral approach has been developed for benchmarking capture options. ► Evaluation for a 250MW demo capture plant integrated with a full scale power plant. CO2 capture based on post-combustion capture has the potentia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of greenhouse gas control Vol. 11; pp. 102 - 113
Main Authors: de Miguel Mercader, Ferran, Magneschi, Guido, Sanchez Fernandez, Eva, Stienstra, Gerard J., Goetheer, Earl L.V.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 01-11-2012
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:► Evaluation of capture options should be done integrated with the power plant. ► Integral approach has been developed for benchmarking capture options. ► Evaluation for a 250MW demo capture plant integrated with a full scale power plant. CO2 capture based on post-combustion capture has the potential to significantly reduce the CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants. However, this capture process reduces considerably the energy efficiency of the power plant. To reduce this energy penalty, this paper studies different post-combustion CO2 capture process configurations combined with different levels of heat integration with the power plant. The cases studied were based on a 1070MWe power plant connected to a demo size capture plant (250MWe equivalent – approximately 1.1Mton CO2 captured/year). The integral evaluation of the energy needed for the capture plant together with the electrical and heat integration with the power plant is a suitable methodology for determining overall power plant efficiency. This approach gives a good overview of the effect of different capture options and integration levels, that cannot be obtained when evaluated independently.
ISSN:1750-5836
1878-0148
DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.09.016