Marked differences between MARC-145 cells and swine alveolar macrophages in IFNβ-induced activation of antiviral state against PRRSV

Marked differences between MARC-145 cells and swine alveolar macrophages in IFNβ-induced activation of antiviral state against PRRSV

The activation of antiviral activity induced by recombinant swine interferon beta (rswIFNβ) against PRRSV was comparatively examined in MARC-145 cells and porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs). A dose–response analysis showed, in MARC-145 cells, that isolate Mo25544 was highly sensitive to rswIFNβ whi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Veterinary immunology and immunopathology Vol. 139; no. 1; pp. 57 - 60
Main Authors: He, D., Overend, C., Ambrogio, J., Maganti, R.J., Grubman, M.J., Garmendia, A.E.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 2011
Amsterdam: Elsevier
Subjects:
Alveolar macrophage
Animals
antiviral properties
biochemical pathways
Cell Line
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
host-pathogen relationships
immune response
Interferon beta
Interferon-beta - immunology
Interferon-beta - pharmacology
interferons
Lymphocyte Activation - drug effects
Lymphocyte Activation - immunology
macrophages
Macrophages, Alveolar - immunology
porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome
Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome - immunology
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)
Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus
Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus - immunology
protein kinases
pulmonary alveoli
recombinant fusion proteins
RNA-dependent protein kinase
swine
Swine - immunology
Swine - virology
virus replication
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)
Alveolar macrophage
Interferon beta
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The activation of antiviral activity induced by recombinant swine interferon beta (rswIFNβ) against PRRSV was comparatively examined in MARC-145 cells and porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs). A dose–response analysis showed, in MARC-145 cells, that isolate Mo25544 was highly sensitive to rswIFNβ while a vaccine strain and isolate PDV130-9301 were resistant to different extents. In contrast, all three viruses were equally sensitive to rswIFNβ in PAMs even at the lowest dose of IFN utilized in the bioassays. To analyze potential differences in mechanisms of antiviral activation between these cells, treatment with 2-aminopurine (2-AP), an inhibitor of double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR), was performed in rswIFNβ-treated cells. Addition of 2-AP to rswIFNβ-primed MARC-145 cells restored replication of the Mo25544 isolate, and to some extent that of vaccine virus and PDV130-9301. In contrast, virus replication could not be rescued for any of the three viruses with 2-AP in rswIFNβ-treated PAMs. The differences in sensitivity of PRRSV to rswIFNβ as well as the effects of 2-AP strongly suggest that MARC-145 cells and PAMs utilize different rswIFNβ-associated antiviral pathways. Therefore, studies to understand virus-host cell interactions performed in MARC-145 cells require additional scrutiny when utilized as a host cell model for immunologic responses to PRRSV.
Bibliography:http://hdl.handle.net/10113/48312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2010.07.023
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0165-2427
1873-2534
DOI:10.1016/j.vetimm.2010.07.023