Search Results - "Macmillan, Neil"

Refine Results
  1. 1

    Sum-Difference Theory of Remembering and Knowing: A Two-Dimensional Signal-Detection Model by Rotello, Caren M, Macmillan, Neil A, Reeder, John A

    Published in Psychological review (01-07-2004)
    “…In the remember-know paradigm for studying recognition memory, participants distinguish items whose presentations are episodically remembered from those that…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  2. 2

    Unequal-Strength Source zROC Slopes Reflect Criteria Placement and Not (Necessarily) Memory Processes by Starns, Jeffrey J, Pazzaglia, Angela M, Rotello, Caren M, Hautus, Michael J, Macmillan, Neil A

    “…Source memory zROC slopes change from below 1 to above 1 depending on which source gets the strongest learning. This effect has been attributed to memory…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  3. 3

    The remember response : Subject to bias, graded, and not a process-pure indicator of recollection by ROTELLO, Caren M, MACMILLAN, Neil A, REEDER, John A, WONG, Mungchen

    Published in Psychonomic bulletin & review (01-10-2005)
    “…Recognition memory judgments have long been assumed to depend on the contributions of two underlying processes: recollection and familiarity. We measured…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  4. 4

    Priming of lowpass-filtered speech affects response bias, not sensitivity, in a bandwidth discrimination task by Freyman, Richard L, Griffin, Amanda M, Macmillan, Neil A

    “…Priming is demonstrated when prior information about the content of a distorted, filtered, or masked auditory message improves its clarity. The current…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  5. 5

    Toward a complete decision model of item and source recognition by Hautus, Michael J., Macmillan, Neil A., Rotello, Caren B.

    Published in Psychonomic bulletin & review (01-10-2008)
    “…In a recognition memory test, subjects may be asked to decide whether a test item is old or new ( item recognition ) or to decide among alternative sources…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  6. 6

    Positive and negative remember judgments and ROCs in the plurals paradigm: Evidence for alternative decision strategies by Kapucu, Aycan, Macmillan, Neil A., Rotello, Caren M.

    Published in Memory & cognition (01-07-2010)
    “…Using old-new ratings and remember-know judgments we explored the plurals paradigm, in which studied words must be distinguished from plurality-changed lures…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  7. 7

    Evaluating models of remember-know judgments: Complexity, mimicry, and discriminability by Cohen, Andrew L., Rotello, Caren M., Macmillan, Neil A.

    Published in Psychonomic bulletin & review (01-10-2008)
    “…Remember-know judgments provide additional information in recognition memory tests, but the nature of this information and the attendant decision process are…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  8. 8

    Interpreting the effects of response bias on remember-know judgments using signal detection and threshold models by ROTELLO, Caren M, MACMILLAN, Neil A, HICKS, Jason L, HAUTUS, Michael J

    Published in Memory & cognition (01-12-2006)
    “…In recognition memory experiments, the tendency to identify a test item as "old" or "new" can be increased or decreased by instructions given at test. The…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  9. 9

    Recall-to-Reject in Recognition: Evidence from ROC Curves by Rotello, Caren M, Macmillan, Neil A, Van Tassel, Gordon

    Published in Journal of memory and language (01-07-2000)
    “…Dual-process models of recognition assume that recognition judgments are based on a fast-acting familiarity-based process and a slower, more accurate,…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  10. 10

    Remember–know models as decision strategies in two experimental paradigms by Rotello, Caren M., Macmillan, Neil A.

    Published in Journal of memory and language (01-11-2006)
    “…In the remember–know paradigm, subjects report the subjective basis for their “old” response to a memory probe to be either recollection of specific details…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  11. 11

    B-type Natriuretic Peptides Strongly Predict Mortality in Patients Who Are Treated with Long-Term Dialysis by Roberts, Matthew A, Srivastava, Piyush M, Macmillan, Neil, Hare, David L, Ratnaike, Sujiva, Sikaris, Ken, Ierino, Francesco L

    “…Left ventricular abnormalities contribute to cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease and may be detected by measurement of B-type…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  12. 12

    Deciding About Decision Models of Remember and Know Judgments: A Reply to Murdock (2006) by Macmillan, Neil A, Rotello, Caren M

    Published in Psychological review (01-07-2006)
    “…B. B. Murdock (2006) has interpreted remember-know data within a decision space defined by item and associative information, the fundamental variables in his…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  13. 13

    Low molecular weight advanced glycation end products predict mortality in asymptomatic patients receiving chronic haemodialysis by Roberts, Matthew A., Thomas, Merlin C., Fernando, Dharsh, Macmillan, Neil, Power, David A., Ierino, Francesco L.

    Published in Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation (01-06-2006)
    “…Background. Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) have biological properties that may contribute to the premature cardiovascular mortality of haemodialysis…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  14. 14

    "Decision-making models of remember-know judgments: Comment on Rotello, Macmillan, and Reeder (2004)": Reply to postscript by Macmillan, Neil A., Rotello, Caren M.

    Published in Psychological review (01-07-2006)
    “…We are in partial (but only partial) agreement with all the points in B. Murdock's (2006) postscript (see record 2006-08257-009). To take his comments in…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  15. 15

    On the importance of models in interpreting remember-know experiments: Comments on Gardiner et al.'s (2002) meta-analysis by Macmillan, Neil, Rotello, Caren, Verde, Michael

    Published in Memory (Hove) (01-08-2005)
    “…From a meta-analysis of recognition experiments using the remember-know-guess paradigm, Gardiner, Ramponi, and Richardson-Klavehn (2002) reported two findings…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  16. 16

    Response Bias: Characteristics of Detection Theory, Threshold Theory, and "Nonparametric" Indexes by Macmillan, Neil A, Creelman, C. Douglas

    Published in Psychological bulletin (01-05-1990)
    “…Models of discrimination based on statistical decision theory distinguish sensitivity (the ability of an observer to reflect a stimulus-response correspondence…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  17. 17
  18. 18

    Detection Theory Analysis of Group Data: Estimating Sensitivity From Average Hit and False-Alarm Rates by Macmillan, Neil A, Kaplan, Howard L

    Published in Psychological bulletin (01-07-1985)
    “…This article assesses the statistical consequences of computing detection-theoretic sensitivity measures ( d ′) from response rates averaged across subjects…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  19. 19

    Integrality in the perception of tongue root position and voice quality in vowels by Kingston, J, Macmillan, N A, Dickey, L W, Thorburn, R, Bartels, C

    “…In English and a large number of African and Southeast Asian languages, voice quality along a tense-lax dimension covaries with advancement of the tongue root…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  20. 20

    Integrality of nasalization and F1. II. Basic sensitivity and phonetic labeling measure distinct sensory and decision-rule interactions by Macmillan, N A, Kingston, J, Thorburn, R, Dickey, L W, Bartels, C

    “…In vowel perception, nasalization and height (the inverse of the first formant, F1) interact. This paper asks whether the interaction results from a sensory…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article