Comparison of automated percutaneous kidney biopsy using needles of different gauge

Percutaneous renal biopsy, an essential procedure for the evaluation of a patient with renal disease, has been improved by the use of semi‐automated, spring‐loaded renal biopsy guns. We have carried out a prospective, randomized study comparing the safety and tissue adequacy for histopathological di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.) Vol. 3; no. 2; pp. 211 - 214
Main Authors: LYNN, Kelvin L, WONG, Kim M, WELSH, Geoffrey J, LAWLER, Lance, GARDNER, Jacqui, BAILEY, Ross R, ROBSON, Richard A, MALING, Tom MJ
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-04-1997
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Percutaneous renal biopsy, an essential procedure for the evaluation of a patient with renal disease, has been improved by the use of semi‐automated, spring‐loaded renal biopsy guns. We have carried out a prospective, randomized study comparing the safety and tissue adequacy for histopathological diagnosis of renal biopsies performed under real‐time ultrasound guidance using the Biopty gun (Bard, Covington, GA, USA) and a 14 or 18 gauge needle on 103 native and 30 transplant kidneys. Repeat biopsy was necessary for only one renal transplant (0.75%) because of inadequate tissue. the biopsy procedure was well tolerated and complications (<5%) were uncommon in both groups. Biopsies of native kidneys with the 14 gauge needle required fewer attempts (3.23 vs 3.98; P= 0.005) and the cores obtained contained more glomeruli for light (24.8 in 2.78 cores vs 16.0 in 3.03 cores; P=0.0001) and immunofluorescence microscopy (9.5 vs 7.4; P= 0.01) than with the 18 gauge needle. Similarly, more glomeruli were obtained from transplant kidneys with the 14 gauge needle (19.5 in 1.19 cores vs 12.9 in 1.57 cores; P=0.004).
Bibliography:istex:AD173D266758A940DE9E46A6C979C64F9529515E
ark:/67375/WNG-8JJHN0J1-B
ArticleID:NEP211
ISSN:1320-5358
1440-1797
DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1797.1997.tb00217.x