Survey of the management of perioperative bridging of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in neurosurgery
Background A growing number of patients on anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy (APT) are planned for elective surgery. The management of perioperative anticoagulation and APT is challenging because it must balance the risk of thromboembolism and bleeding, and specific recommendations for the man...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta neurochirurgica Vol. 160; no. 11; pp. 2077 - 2085 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Vienna
Springer Vienna
01-11-2018
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
A growing number of patients on anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy (APT) are planned for elective surgery. The management of perioperative anticoagulation and APT is challenging because it must balance the risk of thromboembolism and bleeding, and specific recommendations for the management of bridging in neurosurgical patients are lacking. We surveyed German neurosurgical centers about their management of perioperative bridging of anticoagulation and APT to provide an overview of the current bridging policy.
Method
From April to August 2016, all German neurosurgical departments were invited to participate in the survey. We used
SurveyMonkey
to compose ten questions and to conduct the survey, and we defined three different approaches for the perioperative management of patients on a preexisting medication: medication will be discontinued (A) with perioperative “bridging” and (B) without perioperative bridging, or (C) medication will be continued perioperatively.
Results
Out of 141 respondents, 84 (60%) partially and 77 (55%) fully completed the questionnaire. No defined policy for the perioperative management of anticoagulation and APT was established in 60.7% (51/84) of participating centers. The perioperative management of anticoagulation and APT varied widely among different centers in all items of the questionnaire; for example, in the group of patients at high risk for thromboembolism, acetylsalicylic acid was discontinued in 22%, bridged in 35%, and continued in 35% of centers.
Conclusions
There is significant uncertainty regarding the management of perioperative bridging of anticoagulation and APT in neurosurgery because of a lack of prospective and limited retrospective data. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0001-6268 0942-0940 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00701-018-3679-5 |