Search Results - "Lowenkamp, Christopher T"

Refine Results
  1. 1

    RISK, RACE, AND RECIDIVISM: PREDICTIVE BIAS AND DISPARATE IMPACT by SKEEM, JENNIFER L., LOWENKAMP, CHRISTOPHER T.

    Published in Criminology (Beverly Hills) (01-11-2016)
    “…One way to unwind mass incarceration without compromising public safety is to use risk assessment instruments in sentencing and corrections. Although these…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  2. 2

    Predicting Recidivism With the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) in Community-Supervised Male and Female Federal Offenders by Walters, Glenn D., Lowenkamp, Christopher T.

    Published in Psychological assessment (01-06-2016)
    “…Higher order scores derived from the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS; Walters, 1995) have been found to predict recidivism in…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  3. 3

    Revalidation of the Federal PTRA: Testing the PTRA for Predictive Biases by Cohen, Thomas H., Lowenkamp, Christopher T.

    Published in Criminal justice and behavior (01-02-2019)
    “…The pretrial risk assessment instrument (PTRA) was developed for use in the U.S. federal pretrial system. Specifically, this instrument was constructed to help…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  4. 4

    Predicting outcome with the Level of Service Inventory-Revised: The importance of implementation integrity by Flores, Anthony W., Lowenkamp, Christopher T., Holsinger, Alexander M., Latessa, Edward J.

    Published in Journal of criminal justice (01-09-2006)
    “…Correctional agencies face increasing pressure to provide more services for increasing caseloads with fewer resources. The Level of Service Inventory-Revised…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  5. 5

    Risk Assessment Overrides: Shuffling the Risk Deck Without Any Improvements in Prediction by Cohen, Thomas H., Lowenkamp, Christopher T., Bechtel, Kristin, Flores, Anthony W.

    Published in Criminal justice and behavior (01-12-2020)
    “…In the federal supervision system, officers have discretion to depart from the risk designations provided by the Post Conviction Risk Assessment (PCRA)…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  6. 6

    Do Office Reviews in the Federal Probation and Pretrial Services System Do What They Were Intended to Do? Not Yet by Lowenkamp, Christopher T, Pratt, Travis C, Holsinger, Alexander M

    Published in Federal Probation (01-09-2023)
    “…The team reviews district practices and measures those practices against nearly 200 benchmarks included in the office review instrument.2 While the office…”
    Get full text
    Trade Publication Article
  7. 7

    Application of the Risk Principle to Female Offenders by Brusman Lovins, Lori, Lowenkamp, Christopher T., Latessa, Edward J., Smith, Paula

    Published in Journal of contemporary criminal justice (01-11-2007)
    “…Previous research has supported the significance of the principles of effective intervention in correctional treatment. The risk principle suggests that…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  8. 8

    Is Pretrial Detention an Effective Deterrent? An Analysis of Failure to Appear and Rearrest Says No by Holsinger, Alexander M, Lowenkamp, Christopher T, Pratt, Travis C

    Published in Federal Probation (01-06-2023)
    “…In the most recent comprehensive assessment of this idea, Petrich et al.'s (2021) meta-analysis of over 100 studies on the effects of custodial versus…”
    Get full text
    Trade Publication Article
  9. 9

    The Effect of Pretrial Detention on Sentencing in Two Federal Districts by Oleson, J.C., Lowenkamp, Christopher T., Cadigan, Timothy P., VanNostrand, Marie, Wooldredge, John

    Published in Justice quarterly (18-09-2016)
    “…While a substantial body of research indicates that legal variables, such as offense severity and criminal history, principally shape sentencing decisions,…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  10. 10

    False Positives, False Negatives, and False Analyses: A Rejoinder to "Machine Bias: There's Software Used Across the Country to Predict Future Criminals. And It's Biased Against Blacks" by Flores, Anthony W, Bechtel, Kristin, Lowenkamp, Christopher T

    Published in Federal probation (01-09-2016)
    “…Marco and Larkin, 2000, p. 692 PROPUBLICA RECENTLY RELEASED a much-heralded investigative report claiming that a risk assessment tool (known as the COMPAS)…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  11. 11

    A Meta-Analytic Review of Pretrial Research: Risk Assessment, Bond Type, and Interventions by Bechtel, Kristin, Holsinger, Alexander M., Lowenkamp, Christopher T., Warren, Madeline J.

    Published in American journal of criminal justice (01-06-2017)
    “…This study makes an attempt to aggregate what we currently know about pretrial decision making and jurisdictions’ responses to the pretrial population. This…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  12. 12

    Dosage is more than just counting program hours: The importance of role-playing in treatment outcomes by Sperber, Kimberly Gentry, Lowenkamp, Christopher T.

    Published in Journal of offender rehabilitation (03-10-2017)
    “…The risk principle directs correctional practitioners to provide greater amounts of correctional treatment to higher-risk offenders, while the responsivity…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  13. 13

    PCRA Revisited: Testing the Validity of the Federal Post Conviction Risk Assessment (PCRA) by Lowenkamp, Christopher T., Holsinger, Alexander M., Cohen, Thomas H.

    Published in Psychological services (01-05-2015)
    “…The Post Conviction Risk Assessment (PCRA) was developed for use in the U.S. Probation System in 2009. Although previous publications have demonstrated the…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  14. 14

    Ethnicity, gender, and the Level of Service Inventory-Revised by Holsinger, Alexander M, Lowenkamp, Christopher T, Latessa, Edward J

    Published in Journal of criminal justice (01-07-2003)
    “…Offender assessment and classification is becoming an increasingly important part of correctional supervision and intervention. Over the last several decades,…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  15. 15

    Evidence for Risk Estimate Precision: Implications for Individual Risk Communication by Harris, Grant T., Lowenkamp, Christopher T., Hilton, N. Zoe

    Published in Behavioral sciences & the law (01-02-2015)
    “…Actuarial risk assessment instruments using well‐established predictor variables measured at the individual level (e.g., age, criminal history, psychopathy)…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  16. 16

    The Risk Principle in Action: What Have We Learned From 13,676 Offenders and 97 Correctional Programs? by Lowenkamp, Christopher T., Latessa, Edward J., Holsinger, Alexander M.

    Published in Crime and delinquency (01-01-2006)
    “…Over the recent past there have been several meta-analyses and primary studies that support the importance of the risk principle. Oftentimes these studies,…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  17. 17

    Assessing the Effects of Court Date Notifications within Pretrial Case Processing by Lowenkamp, Christopher T., Holsinger, Alexander M., Dierks, Tim

    Published in American journal of criminal justice (01-06-2018)
    “…Jurisdictions at every level throughout the U.S. are paying an increasing amount of attention to pretrial case processing. The primary areas of attention…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  18. 18

    Revalidating the Federal Pretrial Risk Assessment Instrument (PTRA): A Research Summary by Cohen, Thomas H, Lowenkamp, Christopher T, Hicks, William E

    Published in Federal probation (01-09-2018)
    “…[...]this report will briefly address the PTRA's capacity to predict pretrial violations across racial and ethnic groups and for males and females. [...]the…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  19. 19

    Applying the Risk Principle to Sex Offenders: Can Treatment Make Some Sex Offenders Worse? by Lovins, Brian, Lowenkamp, Christopher T., Latessa, Edward J.

    Published in The Prison journal (Philadelphia, Pa.) (01-09-2009)
    “…The risk principle states that higher risk offenders should receive more intensive services, whereas lower risk offenders should receive less intensive…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  20. 20

    The Supervision of Low-Risk Federal Offenders: How the Low-risk Policy Has Changed Federal Supervision Practices without Compromising Community Safety by Cohen, Thomas H, Cook, David, Lowenkamp, Christopher T

    Published in Federal Probation (01-06-2016)
    “…SINCE THE EARLY 2000s, the federal probation and pretrial services system has adopted an approach that emphasizes using evidence-based practices to reduce the…”
    Get full text
    Trade Publication Article