Detecting money laundering transactions with machine learning

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop, describe and validate a machine learning model for prioritising which financial transactions should be manually investigated for potential money laundering. The model is applied to a large data set from Norway’s largest bank, DNB. Design/methodology/a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of money laundering control Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 173 - 186
Main Authors: Jullum, Martin, Løland, Anders, Huseby, Ragnar Bang, Ånonsen, Geir, Lorentzen, Johannes
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London Emerald Publishing Limited 27-01-2020
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop, describe and validate a machine learning model for prioritising which financial transactions should be manually investigated for potential money laundering. The model is applied to a large data set from Norway’s largest bank, DNB. Design/methodology/approach A supervised machine learning model is trained by using three types of historic data: “normal” legal transactions; those flagged as suspicious by the bank’s internal alert system; and potential money laundering cases reported to the authorities. The model is trained to predict the probability that a new transaction should be reported, using information such as background information about the sender/receiver, their earlier behaviour and their transaction history. Findings The paper demonstrates that the common approach of not using non-reported alerts (i.e. transactions that are investigated but not reported) in the training of the model can lead to sub-optimal results. The same applies to the use of normal (un-investigated) transactions. Our developed method outperforms the bank’s current approach in terms of a fair measure of performance. Originality/value This research study is one of very few published anti-money laundering (AML) models for suspicious transactions that have been applied to a realistically sized data set. The paper also presents a new performance measure specifically tailored to compare the proposed method to the bank’s existing AML system.
ISSN:1368-5201
1758-7808
DOI:10.1108/JMLC-07-2019-0055