Adjuvant Hepatic Intra-arterial Iodine-131-Lipiodol Following Curative Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Background The purpose of the present study was to determine whether intrahepatic injection of 131 I-lipiodol (Lipiodol) is effective against recurrence of surgically resected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods From June 2001 through March 2007, this nationwide multi-center prospective randomiz...
Saved in:
Published in: | World journal of surgery Vol. 37; no. 6; pp. 1356 - 1361 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York
Springer-Verlag
01-06-2013
Springer‐Verlag Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether intrahepatic injection of
131
I-lipiodol (Lipiodol) is effective against recurrence of surgically resected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Methods
From June 2001 through March 2007, this nationwide multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled 103 patients 4–6 weeks after curative resection of HCC with complete recovery (52: Lipiodol, 51: Control). Follow-up was every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months. Primary and secondary endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), respectively, both of which were evaluated by the Kaplan–Meier technique and summarized by the hazard ratio (HR). The design was based on information obtained from a similar trial that had been conducted in Hong Kong.
Results
The Lipiodol group showed a small, and nonsignificant, improvement over control in RFS (HR = 0.75; 95 % confidence interval [95 % CI] 0.46–1.23;
p
= 0.25) and OS (HR = 0.88; 95 % CI 0.51–1.51;
p
= 0.64). Only two serious adverse events were reported, both with hypothyroidism caused by
131
I-lipiodol and hepatic artery dissection during angiography.
Conclusions
The randomized trial provides insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of
131
I-lipiodol in these patients. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-2 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0364-2313 1432-2323 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00268-013-1970-4 |