Conversational hypnosis versus standard of care to reduce anxiety in patients undergoing marker placement under radiographic control prior to breast cancer surgery: A randomized, multicenter trial

Surgery is a cornerstone of breast cancer management. Prior to surgery, a wire marker is placed at the site of the tumor, to enable the surgeon to accurately localize the lesion during later surgery. This procedure can generate considerable anxiety for many patients. We investigated the value of con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology Vol. 13; p. 971232
Main Authors: Lemoine, Lydie, Adam, Virginie, Galus, Xavier, Siles, Pascale, Coulon, Agnès, Grenier-Desforges, Jeannette, Orabona, Joseph, Kergastel, Isabelle, Wagner, Pierre, Salleron, Julia, Tosti, Priscillia, Huin-Schohn, Cécile, Merlin, Jean-Louis, Etienne, Rémi, Henrot, Philippe
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media 22-11-2022
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Surgery is a cornerstone of breast cancer management. Prior to surgery, a wire marker is placed at the site of the tumor, to enable the surgeon to accurately localize the lesion during later surgery. This procedure can generate considerable anxiety for many patients. We investigated the value of conversational hypnosis (CH) in reducing anxiety in patients undergoing preoperative wire placement under radiographic control. Randomized, multicentre study in 7 centers in France. Inclusion criteria were patients aged >18 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, scheduled to undergo preoperative wire placement in one or several breast lesions. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by center to undergo preoperative wire placement with or without the use of CH by a radiological technician trained in the CH technique. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with an anxiety score ≥ 6 on a visual analog scale ranging from 0 (absence of anxiety) to 10 (maximal anxiety). Secondary endpoints were pain score, perceived duration reported by the patient, technician satisfaction with their relationship with the patient, and ease of marker insertion reported by the radiologist. Semi-structured interviews were performed with patients to assess their perception of the marker placement procedure. The trial was prematurely interrupted for futility after a planned interim analysis after accrual of 167 patients, i.e., half the planned sample size. Prior to marker placement, 29.3% ( = 24) of patients in the control group had an anxiety score ≥ 6, versus 42.3% ( = 33) in the CH group ( = 0.08). After marker placement, the change of anxiety score was not significantly different between groups (11.0% ( = 9) versus 14.3% ( = 11), = 0.615). There was no significant difference in any of the secondary endpoints. In the interviews, patients from both groups frequently spoke of a feeling of trust. This study failed to show a benefit of conversational hypnosis on anxiety in patients undergoing marker placement prior to surgery for breast cancer. The fact that some caregivers had learned this personalized therapeutic communication technique may have had a positive impact on the whole caregiving team. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02867644).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Nadia Dardenne, University of Liège, Belgium; Zoltan Kekecs, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
This article was submitted to Psycho-Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Edited by: Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971232