Vulvar Melanoma: A Retrospective Analysis and Literature Review

Objective. This review focuses on current directions in the staging and treatment of melanoma of the vulva. Methods. All women treated for invasive melanoma of the vulva at the University of Virginia Health Sciences Center from 1980 through 2000 were identified through a retrospective review of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gynecologic Oncology Vol. 83; no. 3; pp. 457 - 465
Main Authors: Irvin, William P., Legallo, Robin L., Stoler, Mark H., Rice, Laurel W., Taylor, Peyton T., Andersen, Willie A.
Format: Book Review Journal Article
Language:English
Published: San Diego, CA Elsevier Inc 01-12-2001
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective. This review focuses on current directions in the staging and treatment of melanoma of the vulva. Methods. All women treated for invasive melanoma of the vulva at the University of Virginia Health Sciences Center from 1980 through 2000 were identified through a retrospective review of the records of the Division of Gynecologic Oncology. Their treatments and outcomes were then analyzed and presented. Results. Over the 20-year study period, 14 cases of melanoma of the vulva were identified. Of the 14 patients treated with curative intent, 6 developed recurrences following the completion of primary therapy, and all are dead from their disease. The mean duration from completion of therapy to recurrence was 7.5 months; the mean survival following recurrence was 17 months. Conclusion. One-centimeter skin margins appear adequate for vulvar melanomas <1 mm thick, and 2-cm margins appear adequate for intermediate-thickness melanomas (1–4 mm). In all cases it is necessary to include at least a 1-cm-deep margin extending through the subcutaneous fat to the muscular fascia below. Elective node dissection seems to offer no additional advantage in superficial lesions <0.76 mm thick, and its role in deeper lesions is still uncertain.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0090-8258
1095-6859
DOI:10.1006/gyno.2001.6337