Interpersonal distance preferences: an unexplored consequence of hearing loss

Background Interpersonal distance (IPD), which reflects the physical space between people, ensures the regulation of social behavior in interaction as part of nonverbal communication. Our research aims to reveal whether there is a difference in personal distance preference between individuals with h...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	The Egyptian journal of otolaryngology Vol. 39; no. 1; pp. 184 - 9
Main Authors:	Yılar, Selma, Deniz, Burcu, Baltacı, Işık, Cogen, Talha, Deniz, Rışvan, Telci, Fatma, Demirel, Esra, Altun, Koray, Kural, Hande, Emül, Murat
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 30-11-2023 Springer Nature B.V SpringerOpen
Subjects:	Age Anxiety Behavior Cochlear implants Communication Gender Hearing aids Hearing loss Hearing protection Interpersonal distance Males Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Article Personal space Physiology Proxemic Surgery White people Cochlear implants Personal space Hearing aids Interpersonal distance Proxemic Hearing loss
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Background Interpersonal distance (IPD), which reflects the physical space between people, ensures the regulation of social behavior in interaction as part of nonverbal communication. Our research aims to reveal whether there is a difference in personal distance preference between individuals with hearing loss and normal hearing (NH). Methods Thirty-five adults (26.54 ± 7.05 years) were divided into three groups according to hearing status: hearing aid (HA) users, cochlear implant (CI) users, and NH individuals. The preferred interpersonal distance scale (PIPDS) and a stop distance paradigm were employed for measurements in various environments. Personal space violations were monitored using an electrodermal activity (EDA) wristband. Results Our findings showed a significant relationship between preferred interpersonal distance (PID) and hearing loss duration (r = 571; p < .01) and a significant difference in PIDs between CI users and NH individuals ( p = .025). There was a correlation between PIPDS results and interpersonal distance preference in two outdoor conditions where the experimenter was male. However, there was no correlation between interpersonal distance and EDA results. Conclusions For the CI group, PIPDS results indicated an increased interpersonal distance preference with the severity of hearing loss, possibly to enhance lip-reading cues and conceal visible hearing aids. Understanding these preferences is essential for effective communication and good interpersonal relationships among individuals with hearing loss.
ISSN:	2090-8539 1012-5574 2090-8539
DOI:	10.1186/s43163-023-00547-4