Aortic velocity propagation: A novel echocardiographic method in predicting atherosclerotic coronary artery disease burden
The major burden of cardiovascular disease mortality around the globe is due to atherosclerosis and its complications. Hence its early detection and management with easily accessible and noninvasive methods are valuable. Aortic velocity propagation (AVP) through color M-mode of the proximal descendi...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal Of The Saudi Heart Association Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 176 - 184 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
01-07-2017
Elsevier Saudi Heart Association |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The major burden of cardiovascular disease mortality around the globe is due to atherosclerosis and its complications. Hence its early detection and management with easily accessible and noninvasive methods are valuable. Aortic velocity propagation (AVP) through color M-mode of the proximal descending aorta determines aortic stiffness, reflecting atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to find the utility of AVP in predicting coronary artery disease (CAD) burden assessed through SYNTAX (SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery) score and compared with carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), which is an established surrogate marker of atherosclerosis.
In this cross-sectional comparative study, we measured AVP by color M-mode and CIMT by using Philips QLAB-IMT software in 100 patients, who underwent conventional coronary angiogram (CAG) between May 2013 and November 2014. Coronary artery disease is considered significant if >50% diameter stenosis is present in any epicardial coronary artery and insignificant if otherwise.
Initially, to know the normal range we measured AVP and CIMT in 50 patients without any major risk factors for CAD but CAG was not done. Aortic velocity propagation ranged from 46cm/s to 76cm/s (mean=58.62±6.46cm/s), CIMT ranged from 0.50mm to 0.64mm (mean=0.55±0.03mm). Among 100 patients who underwent CAG we found 69% had significant CAD, 13% had insignificant CAD, and 18% had normal coronaries. Those with significant CAD had significantly lower AVP (41.65±4.94cm/s) [F (2,97)=44.05, p<0.0001] and significantly higher CIMT (0.86±0.11mm) [F (2,97) =35.78, p<0.0001]. AVP had significant strong negative correlation with CIMT (r=−0.836, p<0.0001, n=100) and SYNTAX score (r=–0.803, p<0.0001, n=69), while CIMT was positively correlated with SYNTAX score significantly (r=0.828, p<0.0001, n=69).
AVP and CIMT can predict CAD burden in a robust way. AVP may emerge as an exquisite bedside tool to predict atherosclerotic burden and guide in implementing preventive therapy for cardiovascular disease. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 1016-7315 2212-5043 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jsha.2016.10.006 |