Search Results - "Kramer, John H."

Refine Results
  1. 1

    The Race of Defendants and Victims in Pennsylvania Death Penalty Decisions: 2000-2010 by Ulmer, Jeffery T., Kramer, John H., Zajac, Gary

    Published in Justice quarterly (28-07-2020)
    “…This study uses propensity score weighting to examine three key death penalty decisions in Pennsylvania from 2000-2010, focusing on the role of defendant and…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  2. 2

    THE SOCIAL CONTEXT OF GUIDELINES CIRCUMVENTION: THE CASE OF FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS by JOHNSON, BRIAN D., ULMER, JEFFERY T., KRAMER, JOHN H.

    Published in Criminology (Beverly Hills) (01-08-2008)
    “…Recent scholarship on criminal punishments increasingly highlights the importance of courtroom social contexts. Combining recent data from the U.S. Sentencing…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  3. 3

    Geographic arbitrariness? County court variation in capital prosecution and sentencing in Pennsylvania by Ulmer, Jeffery T., Zajac, Gary, Kramer, John H.

    Published in Criminology & public policy (01-11-2020)
    “…Research Summary The death penalty remains one of the most controversial issues of criminal punishment not only because of racial/ethnic disparities, wrongful…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  4. 4

    Prosecutorial Discretion and the Imposition of Mandatory Minimum Sentences by Ulmer, Jeffery T., Kurlychek, Megan C., Kramer, John H.

    “…In Pennsylvania, the imposition of mandatory minimum sentences presents an important opportunity to examine relatively “pure” prosecutorial discretion over…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  5. 5

    Racial disparity in the wake of the Booker/Fanfan decision: An alternative analysis to the USSC's 2010 report by Ulmer, Jeffery T., Light, Michael T., Kramer, John H.

    Published in Criminology & public policy (01-11-2011)
    “…The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Booker and a joint case United States v. Fanfan (2005, hereafter Booker and Fanfan, respectively) that the…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  6. 6

    DOWNWARD DEPARTURES FOR SERIOUS VIOLENT OFFENDERS: LOCAL COURT “CORRECTIONS” TO PENNSYLVANIA'S SENTENCING GUIDELINES by KRAMER, JOHN H., ULMER, JEFFERY T.

    Published in Criminology (Beverly Hills) (01-11-2002)
    “…We examine downward departures for serious violent offenders, using quantitative and qualitative data from Pennsylvania. We find that offense severity and…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  7. 7

    Closing the Revolving Door?: Substance Abuse Treatment as an Alternative to Traditional Sentencing for Drug-Dependent Offenders by Warner, Tara D., Kramer, John H.

    Published in Criminal justice and behavior (01-01-2009)
    “…The criminal justice system is often viewed as a revolving door for drug-dependent offenders due to its failure to recognize the association between addiction…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  8. 8

    COURT COMMUNITIES UNDER SENTENCING GUIDELINES: DILEMMAS OF FORMAL RATIONALITY AND SENTENCING DISPARITY by ULMER, JEFFERY T., KRAMER, JOHN H.

    Published in Criminology (Beverly Hills) (01-08-1996)
    “…Efforts to structure sentencing through guidelines involve a fundamental dilemma for the sociology of law—guidelines attempt to emphasize formal rationality…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  9. 9

    Mandatory sentencing guidelines: The framing of justice by Kramer, John H.

    Published in Criminology & public policy (01-05-2009)
    “…Kramer asks why the sentencing reform movement has yielded such a small effect. He identifies several issues he believes help account for the limited amount of…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  10. 10

    Racial disparity in the wake of the Booker/Fanfan decision by Ulmer, Jeffery T., Light, Michael T., Kramer, John H.

    Published in Criminology & public policy (01-11-2011)
    “…The U.S. Sentencing Commission (USSC) released a report in March 2010 concluding that disparity in federal sentencing has increased in the wake of the U.S…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  11. 11

    Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines by Kramer, John H., Ulmer, Jeffery T.

    Published in Justice quarterly (01-03-1996)
    “…Unwarranted sentencing disparity, a long-standing concern for sociologists studying criminal sentencing, helped to stimulate reforms of sentencing such as…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  12. 12

    The Use and Transformation of Formal Decision-Making Criteria: Sentencing Guidelines, Organizational Contexts, and Case Processing Strategies by Ulmer, Jeffery T., Kramer, John H.

    Published in Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.) (01-05-1998)
    “…Recent sociological research in organizations has emphasized the "filtering" of externally-imposed formal policies and rules through local organizational…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  13. 13
  14. 14

    Offender Characteristics and the Purposes of Sentencing by Kramer, John H.

    Published in Federal sentencing reporter (01-11-1996)
    “…Whether characteristics other than criminal history should play a greater role in deciding sentences; recommends that the US Sentencing Commission reevaluate…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  15. 15

    Divergent paths to federal and Pennsylvania sentencing guideline reforms by Kramer, John H

    Published in The Judges' journal (22-09-2012)
    “…[...]began the movement to create guided judicial discretion. In response to growing crime rates in the 1960s and 1970s, presidential candidate Barry Goldwater…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  16. 16
  17. 17

    Sentencing guidelines: A quantitative comparison of sentencing policies in Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Washington by Kramer, John H., Lubitz, Robin L., Kempinen, Cynthia A.

    Published in Justice quarterly (01-12-1989)
    “…During the past decade, several states established special commissions to develop sentencing guidelines. This article employs a simulation methodology to…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  18. 18
  19. 19

    Overview of: "Racial disparity in the wake of the Booker/Fanfan decision by Ulmer, Jeffery T., Light, Michael T., Kramer, John H.

    Published in Criminology & public policy (01-11-2011)
    “…Research Summary The U.S. Sentencing Commission (USSC) released a report in March 2010 concluding that disparity in federal sentencing has increased in the…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  20. 20