Scenario analysis of embodied energy and CO2 emissions for multistory apartments in Indonesia

Scenario analysis of embodied energy and CO2 emissions for multistory apartments in Indonesia

Contribution in the building sector to the global warming can be tackled by diminishing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (mainly CO 2 ) not only from operational energy but also from the embodied energy (EE) of construction materials. Harvested Wood Products (HWP) such as Cross Laminated Timber (CLT),...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:E3S web of conferences Vol. 396; p. 4015
Main Authors: Alvarez, Diego, Kouda, Riko, Ho, Anh Dung, Kubota, Tetsu
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 01-01-2023
Subjects:
displacement factor
embodied energy
material sustainability
wood harvested products
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Contribution in the building sector to the global warming can be tackled by diminishing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (mainly CO 2 ) not only from operational energy but also from the embodied energy (EE) of construction materials. Harvested Wood Products (HWP) such as Cross Laminated Timber (CLT), Glued Laminated (Glulam) timber, among others, make multistorey wooden buildings possible. These wooden buildings could help to reduce EE and CO 2 emissions significantly. A material flow analysis (MFA) using an I-O (Input-Output) table was used to compare three scenarios for an 8-story apartment building in Indonesia (total floor area: 9140 m 2 ): First, the building had a reinforced concrete structure. Second, the building had a “hybrid” structure with reinforced concrete cores and first-floor elements, consisting of CLT floor panels, and Glulam columns and beams. Third, the building used only CLT panels besides reinforced concrete cores. The results showed that the last scenario achieved the largest CO 2 emissions and embodied energy reductions (58 t-CO 2 and 905 GJ), compared with the first scenario (81 t-CO 2 and 1110 GJ). Furthermore, we compare two methods to apply displacement factors (DF) to assess the CO 2 emissions savings for each CO 2 ton in wood products substituted in place of non-wooden products between the three building scenarios.
ISSN:2267-1242
2267-1242
DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/202339604015