Individualised Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Settings Reduce the Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Progressive atelectasis regularly occurs during general anaesthesia; hence, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is often applied. Individualised PEEP titration may reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and improve oxygenation as compared to fixed PEEP s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical medicine Vol. 13; no. 22; p. 6776
Main Authors: Szigetváry, Csenge, Szabó, Gergő V., Dembrovszky, Fanni, Ocskay, Klementina, Engh, Marie A., Turan, Caner, Szabó, László, Walter, Anna, Kobeissi, Fadl, Terebessy, Tamás, Hegyi, Péter, Ruszkai, Zoltán, Molnár, Zsolt
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 11-11-2024
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Progressive atelectasis regularly occurs during general anaesthesia; hence, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is often applied. Individualised PEEP titration may reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and improve oxygenation as compared to fixed PEEP settings; however, evidence is lacking. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021282228). A systematic search in four databases (MEDLINE Via PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science) was performed on 14 October 2021 and updated on 26 April 2024. We searched for randomised controlled trials comparing the effects of individually titrated versus fixed PEEP strategies during abdominal surgeries. The primary endpoint was the incidence of PPCs. The secondary endpoints included the PaO2/FiO2 at the end of surgery, individually set PEEP value, vasopressor requirements, and respiratory mechanics. Results: We identified 30 trials (2602 patients). The incidence of PPCs was significantly lower among patients in the individualised group (RR = 0.70, CI: 0.58–0.84). A significantly higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio was found in the individualised group as compared to controls at the end of the surgery (MD = 55.99 mmHg, 95% CI: 31.78–80.21). Individual PEEP was significantly higher as compared to conventional settings (MD = 6.27 cm H2O, CI: 4.30–8.23). Fewer patients in the control group needed vasopressor support; however, this result was non-significant. Lung-function-related outcomes showed better respiratory mechanics in the individualised group (Cstat: MD = 11.92 cm H2O 95% CI: 6.40–17.45). Conclusions: Our results show that individually titrated PEEP results in fewer PPCs and better oxygenation in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
ISSN:2077-0383
2077-0383
DOI:10.3390/jcm13226776