Search Results - "Klym, Amy H"

  • Showing 1 - 18 results of 18
Refine Results
  1. 1

    Bilateral mammographic density asymmetry and breast cancer risk: A preliminary assessment by Zheng, Bin, Sumkin, Jules H, Zuley, Margarita L, Wang, Xingwei, Klym, Amy H, Gur, David

    Published in European journal of radiology (01-11-2012)
    “…Abstract To improve efficacy of breast cancer screening and prevention programs, it requires a risk assessment model with high discriminatory power. This study…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  2. 2

    Trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography in an academic practice by Gur, David, Wallace, Luisa P, Klym, Amy H, Hardesty, Lara A, Abrams, Gordon S, Shah, Ratan, Sumkin, Jules H

    Published in Radiology (01-05-2005)
    “…To retrospectively evaluate whether recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for a group of radiologists who met requirements of Mammography Quality Standards…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  3. 3

    Classification of thyroid nodules using a resonance-frequency-based electrical impedance spectroscopy: a preliminary assessment by Zheng, Bin, Tublin, Mitchell E, Klym, Amy H, Gur, David

    Published in Thyroid (New York, N.Y.) (01-07-2013)
    “…Ultrasound and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy are considered the most effective approaches for both identifying and classifying thyroid…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  4. 4
  5. 5

    Impact of the new density reporting laws: radiologist perceptions and actual behavior by Gur, David, Klym, Amy H, King, Jill L, Bandos, Andriy I, Sumkin, Jules H

    Published in Academic radiology (01-06-2015)
    “…To assess radiologists' perceptions of how the new Breast Density Notification Act (BDNA) of Pennsylvania would affect their breast density reporting and their…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  6. 6

    Prescreening Mammography by Technologists: A Preliminary Assessment by Sumkin, Jules H, Klaman, Herta M, Graham, Marianne, Ruskauff, Theresa, Gennari, Rose C, King, Jill L, Klym, Amy H, Ganott, Marie A, Gur, David

    Published in American journal of roentgenology (1976) (01-01-2003)
    “…We assessed the ability of technologists to accurately classify screening mammograms as either showing negative findings or requiring follow-up. In a…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  7. 7

    Impact of the New Density Reporting Laws by Gur, David, ScD, Klym, Amy H., MS, King, Jill L., MS, Bandos, Andriy I., PhD, Sumkin, Jules H., DO

    Published in Academic radiology (01-06-2015)
    “…Rationale and Objectives To assess radiologists' perceptions of how the new Breast Density Notification Act (BDNA) of Pennsylvania would affect their breast…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  8. 8

    The prevalence effect in a laboratory environment: Changing the confidence ratings by Gur, David, Bandos, Andriy I, Fuhrman, Carl R, Klym, Amy H, King, Jill L, Rockette, Howard E

    Published in Academic radiology (01-01-2007)
    “…We sought to assess whether or not prevalence levels affected the confidence ratings of readers during the interpretation of cases in a laboratory receiver…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  9. 9

    Screening mammography: do women prefer a higher recall rate given the possibility of earlier detection of cancer? by Ganott, Marie A, Sumkin, Jules H, King, Jill L, Klym, Amy H, Catullo, Victor J, Cohen, Cathy S, Gur, David

    Published in Radiology (01-03-2006)
    “…To prospectively survey women undergoing screening mammography to assess their attitudes toward and preference for the level of recall rates given the…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  10. 10

    Binary and multi-category ratings in a laboratory observer performance study: A comparison by Gur, David, Bandos, Andriy I., King, Jill L., Klym, Amy H., Cohen, Cathy S., Hakim, Christiane M., Hardesty, Lara A., Ganott, Marie A., Perrin, Ronald L., Poller, William R., Shah, Ratan, Sumkin, Jules H., Wallace, Luisa P., Rockette, Howard E.

    Published in Medical physics (Lancaster) (01-10-2008)
    “…The authors investigated radiologists, performances during retrospective interpretation of screening mammograms when using a binary decision whether to recall…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  11. 11

    Reader variance in ROC studies--generalizability to reader population at high and low performance levels by Gur, David, Bandos, Andriy I, Klym, Amy H, Rockette, Howard E

    Published in Academic radiology (01-08-2006)
    “…To investigate the variability between discriminative performances of readers as a function of average performance levels during receiver operating…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  12. 12

    The effect of image display size on observer performance an assessment of variance components by Gur, David, Klym, Amy H, King, Jill L, Maitz, Glenn S, Mello-Thoms, Claudia, Rockette, Howard E, Thaete, F Leland

    Published in Academic radiology (01-04-2006)
    “…Our goal was to investigate the effect of the displayed image size on variance components during the performance of an observer performance study to detect…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  13. 13

    Is Maximum Positive Predictive Value a Good Indicator of an Optimal Screening Mammography Practice? by Hardesty, Lara A, Klym, Amy H, Shindel, Betty E, Chough, Denise M, Sumkin, Jules H, Gur, David

    Published in American journal of roentgenology (1976) (01-05-2005)
    “…Positive predictive value (PPV1) has been used as one important indicator of the quality of screening mammography programs. We show how the relationship…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  14. 14

    The Prevalence Effect in a Laboratory Environment by Gur, David, Sc.D, Bandos, Andriy I., Ph.D, Fuhrman, Carl R., M.D, Klym, Amy H., B.S, King, Jill L., M.S, Rockette, Howard E., Ph.D

    Published in Academic radiology (2007)
    “…Rationale and Objectives We sought to assess whether or not prevalence levels affected the confidence ratings of readers during the interpretation of cases in…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  15. 15

    Variability in observer performance studies experimental observations by Gur, David, Rockette, Howard E, Maitz, Glenn S, King, Jill L, Klym, Amy H, Bandos, Andriy I

    Published in Academic radiology (01-12-2005)
    “…The aim of the study is to assess variance components in observer performance studies and the possible impact on study results and conclusions. Two previously…”
    Get more information
    Journal Article
  16. 16
  17. 17

    Detection of Masses and Clustered Microcalcifications on Data Compressed Mammograms: An Observer Performance Study by Good, Walter F, Sumkin, Jules H, Ganott, Marie, Hardesty, Lara, Holbert, Brenda, Johns, Christopher M, Klym, Amy H

    Published in American journal of roentgenology (1976) (01-12-2000)
    “…To evaluate observers' ability to detect breast masses and clustered microcalcifications depicted on data compressed mammograms, an observer performance study…”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  18. 18